FPA-PMLA-1159/JL/2015 of Gurmit Kaur v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar
Case brief
What is this about?
Appellant sought an adjournment due to unavailability of counsel; matter listed for future date.
What the court decided
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2302/JL/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1159/JL/2015
Gurmit Kaur … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Atul Kumar, Advocate for Shri Abhimanyu Sharma, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 26.10.2016
FPA-PMLA-1159/JL /2015
The Ld. Counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant states that the
main arguing counsel is not available and seeks an adjournment.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Gurmit Kaur
- respondent
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar
Coram
MANMOHAN SINGH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court