This interim stay order fixes a timeline for the respondent to file a reply to the appellant's consolidated statements regarding attached property rent and lists the matter for hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2697/KOL/2016 (Stay) MP-PMLA-2301/KOL/2016 (Stay)
&
FPA-PMLA-1156/KOL/2015
M/s. Akhil Orchards Pvt. Ltd.
… Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Rudro Chatterjee, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Anukalp Jain, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 28.10.2016
MP-PMLA-2697/KOL/2016 (Stay), MP-PMLA-2301/KOL/2016 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1156/KOL/2015
The counsel for the respondent has filed the reply to the appeal as well as the reply to the consolidated statements made by the appellant regarding the rent received in respect of the attached property. Copy of the same be served within one week and rejoinder be filed thereafter.
List on 3rd February, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 28th October, 2016 ‘d’
FPA-PMLA-1156/KOL/2015
Page 1 of 1
M/s. Akhil Orchards Pvt. Ltd.
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
