An appellant/applicant appeared in a maintenance application challenging a Commission Order. The appellant objected to filing a rejoinder and sought to argue on the next date. The matter was listed for a future hearing on February 22, 2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2234/JL/2015 (Stay) &
FPA-PMLA-1130/JL/2015 Baltej Kaur … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Vishal Deep Goyal, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER
01.12.2016
FPA-PMLA-1130/JL/2015
Reply to the appeal has been filed. The learned counsel for the
appellant states that rejoinder is not necessary and he will make his
submission on the next date.
List on 22nd February, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 1st December, 2016 ‘R’
FPA-PMLA-1130/JL/2015
Page 1 of 1
Baltej Kaur
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar
MANMOHAN SINGH
G.C. MISHRA
B.K. BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
