An interlocutory order concerning a fresh property attachment. The court granted the appellant an opportunity to file a reply and listed the proceeding for future hearing.
Grant of four weeks to the respondent to file a reply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2158/DLI/2015 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-2159/DLI/2015 (STAY) FPA-PMLA-1122/DLI/2015
Gaurav Gupta … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Naveen Malhotra, Advocate For the respondent : Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 24.11.2016
MP-PMLA-2158/DLI/2015 (STAY)
Reply has not been filed by the respondent. One final opportunity
is granted to counsel for the respondent to file the reply within four weeks with an advance copy to learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within two weeks thereafter.
MP-PMLA-2159/DLI/2016 (Misc.)
Re-notified this application.
FPA-PMLA-1122/DLI/2015
Pleadings are complete. Interim order to continue.
List on 24th March, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 24th November, 2016 ‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1122/DLI/2015
Page 1 of 1
Gaurav Gupta
Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
