Single-paragraph order listing a brief inter-com reply for the respondent to be filed within six weeks and scheduling a listing for future hearing.
Reply to be filed within six weeks with advance copy; rejoinder to be filed four weeks thereafter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2021/KOL/2015 (Misc.) FPA-PMLA-1072/KOL/2015
Union Bank of India … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Rajeev Sagar, Advocate For the respondent : Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER
08.12.2016
MP-PMLA-2021/KOL/2015 (Mics.) & FPA-PMLA-1072/KOL/2015
The learned counsel for the respondent seeks time to file the reply.
Let the same be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file rejoinder four weeks thereafter.
List on 9th March, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 8th December, 2016 ‘R’
FPA-PMLA-1072/KOL/2015
Page 1 of 1
Union Bank of India
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
