The Appellate Tribunal listed the application for adjournment as printed, with no substantive disposition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2095/JL/2015 (Stay) &
FPA-PMLA-1062/JL /2015
Sukhjit Singh@ Sukkha … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Atul Kumar, Advocate for Shri Abhimanyu Sharma, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER
26.10.2016
FPA-PMLA-1062/JL /2015
The Ld. Counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant states that the
main arguing counsel is not available and seeks an adjournment.
The learned counsel for the respondent has not objection.
List on 15th February, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh)
Chairman
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi,
26th October, 2016
‘s’
FPA-PMLA-1062/JL/2015
Page 1 of 1
Sukhjit Singh@ Sukkha
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
