FPA-ND-73/DLI/2016 of Tarsem Kaur v/s The Competent Authority, Delhi
Case brief
What is this about?
The Appeals Tribunal held that the confirmation order in forfeiture proceedings is interim and proceedings start only after trial conviction. The court did not dispose of the appeal.
What the court decided
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
MP-ND-57/DLI/2016 (SP)
&
FPA-ND-73/DLI/2016
Tarsem Kaur … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Delhi
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Ashok Giri, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri D.S. Bisht, J.C. |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 17.10.2016
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the confirmation order in forfeiture proceedings is an interim order requiring no reply at this stage.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Tarsem Kaur
- respondent
The Competent Authority, Delhi
Coram
Justice Manmohan Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · October
- Case no.
- FPA-ND-73/DLI/2016
- Topic
- Narcotics (NDPS)
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court