The Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property, New Delhi, recorded an agreement to supply the paper book and granted an adjournment due to the appellant counsel's personal difficulty.
Adjournment granted; appellant directed to file paper book.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
FPA-ND-61/MUM/2016
Mrs. Shalini Ashitkar … Appellant Versus The Competent Authority, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Satbir Tillania, Advocate For the respondent : Shri R.N. D’Souza, Joint Commissioner Shri Stanly Joseph, Inspecting Officer
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
25.10.2016
FPA-ND-61/MUM/2016
The learned authorized representative for the respondent states that the appellant has not supplied the paper book. The counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant agrees to supply the paper book within two weeks at the office of learned authorized representative for the respondent. Even otherwise counsel for the appellant submits that the main counsel is in personal difficulty. He seeks an adjournment which is not opposed by the respondent.
List on 24th January, 2017.
FPA-ND-61/MUM/2016
Page 1 of 2
In the meanwhile the appellant is directed to file the complete set of paper book of documents before the lower authority and which are required for the purpose of the appeal.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 25th October, 2016
‘R’
FPA-ND-61/MUM/2016
Page 2 of 2
Mrs. Shalini Ashitkar
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
