No one appeared on behalf of the appellant in the last five hearings. The appellant is in judicial custody. Registry directed notice to be issued to the appellant and her authorized representative for the next hearing.
Registry directed to issue notice to appellant and authorized representative to appear for next hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
FPA-ND-46/KOL/2015
Padmabati Digal … Appellant/ Applicant Versus The Competent Authority, Kolkata … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : None |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Haridas Saha, Joint Commissioner |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 24.10.2016
FPA-ND-46/KOL/2015
In the last five hearings, no one has appeared on behalf of the appellant. The counsel for the respondent submits that the appellant is in judicial custody. The appeal was filed through authorized representative who also did not appear when the matter was taken up.
Let the registry issue the notice to the appellant as well as to the authorized representative to appear and represent the case on the next date of hearing.
Copy of the order be served on the appellant through respondent who would file the affidavit of the service before the next date of hearing.
FPA-ND-46/KOL/2015
Page 1 of 2
List on 16th February, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 24th October, 2016
‘s’
FPA-ND-46/KOL/2015
Page 2 of 2
Padmabati Digal
The Competent Authority, Kolkata
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
