The Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property listed this appeal for disposition. The respondent filed a short reply on maintainability. The tribunal adjourned for the filing of a detailed reply within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
FPA-ND-35/DLI/2015
Jagjit Singh … Appellant Versus The Competent Authority, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : | Shri Pradeep Virk, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondent | : | Shri Manoj Dargar Maheshwari, Advocate |
| CORAM | ||
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : | CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : | MEMBER |
ORDER
10.10.2016
FPA-ND-35/DLI/2015
The detailed reply has not been filed. The respondent no. 1 has filed the short reply/application regarding the maintainability of the present appeal. It is appropriate that detailed reply be filed within four weeks from today with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder four weeks thereafter. In the meanwhile the vakalatnama filed by Shri Pradeep Virk, Advocate is taken on record.
List on 19th January, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 10th October, 2016
‘R’
FPA-ND-35/DLI/2015
Page 1 of 1
Jagjit Singh
The Competent Authority, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
