Order listing the petition for arguments on 17 January 2017. The court deferred deciding the appeal. No legal principles were laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
FPA-ND-29/BOM/2014
Shah Krutiben Hemai Kumar … Appellant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Saurabh Rajpal, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Sh. Siddharth Majumdar, Inspecting Officer |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER 06.12.2016
FPA-ND-29/BOM/2014
Rejoinder has not been filed. The counsel for the appellant submits that the same is ready and would be filed during the course of the day itself. A copy of the same has been handed over to the counsel for the respondent.
List for arguments on 17th January, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 6th December, 2016 ‘s’
FPA-ND-29/BOM/2014 Page 1 of 1
Shah Krutiben Hemai Kumar
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
