The Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property directed the appeal pending before it be listed after the appellant deposited Rs.5000 as a cost and made up for missing appearances.
Listed for further proceedings after deposit of Rs.5000 by the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
MP-35/MDS/2014 (SP)
&
FPA-3/MDS/2014 T.P. Abdul Salam … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Chennai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : None For the respondent : Shri Christopher Vasanth, I.O.
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 18.10.2016
MP-35/MDS/2014 (SP) & FPA-3/MDS/2014
On 12th May, 2015 the appeal and the application were put up for further arguments on 21st May, 2015. From the said date, it has been noticed that learned counsel for the appellant has been taking adjournments in the matter.
Even today when the matter is called on the second turn, none appears on behalf of the appellant.
Subject to the cost of Rs.5000/- to be deposited by the appellant with the Competent Authority by way of bank draft within four weeks, list this matter on 24th January, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore)
Member
New Delhi, 18th October, 2016
‘R’
FPA-3/MDS/2014
Page 1 of 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
T.P. Abdul Salam
The Competent Authority, Chennai
MANMOHAN SINGH
KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA
ANAND KISHORE
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
