Partly allowed

A.No. 20 of 2020 & Ia No. 2213 of 2019 of West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Limited. v. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission & Anr.

APTEL13 Mar 2020A.No. 20 of 2020 & IA No. 2213 of 2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order addresses an appeal challenging a Central Electricity Regulatory Commission decision on a recovery claim. The Appellant contended the petition was time-barred. The Tribunal, with the consent of both parties, remitted the distinct issue of limitation to the Central Commission for a fresh hearing and decision, while keeping the findings on merits on hold pending that outcome.

What did the court decide?

The issue of limitation is remitted to the Central Commission for fresh consideration and decision; the findings on merits are kept on hold.

A.No. 20 of 2020 & Ia No. 2213 of 2019 of West Bengal State… — Banking and Recovery | APTEL (2020)

¶1

IN THE APPELLA TE TRIBUNAL FOR ELECTRICITY (Appellate Jurisdiction)

¶2

Appeal No. 20 of 2020 & IA No. 2213 of 2019

¶3

Dated: 13^th March , 2020

¶4

Present: Honble Mr. Ravindra Kumar Verma,Technical Member(Electricity) Honble Mr. Justice R.K. Gauba, Judicial Member

¶5

West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Limited Through its Authorized Signatory Vidyut Bhawan, Block – DJ, ….Appellant 7^th Floor, Sector II, Salt Lake, Kolkata – 700 091

¶6

Versus

¶7

1. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission Through its Secretary 3^rd & 4^th Floor, Chanderlok Building 36, Janpath, New Delhi – 110 001 …Respondent No.1

¶8

2. Damodar Valley Corporation Through its Chairman Damodar Towers, VIP Road Kolkata (W.B.) – 700 054

¶9

…Respondent No.2

¶10

Counsel for the Appellant(s) : Mr. Amit Kapur Mr. Vishrov Mukerjee Mr. Rohit Venkat V. Ms.Raveena Dhamija Mr. Yashaswi Kant Mr. Ameya Vikram Mishra Mr. Girik Bhalla Mr.Pratyush Singh

¶11

Appeal No. 20 of 2020

¶12

Page 1 of 5

¶13

Counsel for the Respondent(s) : Mr. M.G. Ramachandran, Sr. Adv. Ms.Ranjitha Ramachandran Ms.Poorva Saigal, Ms.Anushree Bardhan Mr. Shubham Arya Mr. Arvind Kumar Dubey Mr. Tanya Sareen for Res.2

¶14

ORDER (ORAL)

¶15

PER HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. GAUBA, JUDICIAL MEMBER

¶16

The Appellant West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company (WBSEDCL) has come up with the present appeal challenging the order dated 01.11.2019 of Central

¶17

Electricity Regulatory Commission (the Central Commission) in Petition No. 298/MP/2018 which had been instituted by the Respondent Damodar Valley Corporation (DVC) seeking declaration as to right to recover a sum aggregating Rs.111,74,47,434 Crores towards principal and delayed payment surcharge at the rate of 1.5% per month as on 31.08.2019 along with further interest till payment. It appears that the Appellant had resisted the claim by raising the issue of limitation pleading that the

¶18

Appeal No. 20 of 2020

¶19

Page 2 of 5

¶20

petition of DVC could not be entertained, it being time barred.

¶21

The Central Commission, by the impugned order, appears to have rejected the above said objection and also considered the prayer of DVC on merits and issued directions to that effect, treating the objection giving rise to mixed issue of facts and law. The prime contention raised by the Appellant at this stage in the present appeal is that the contentions vis-à-vis the issue of limitation have not been properly examined or adjudicated upon, the view taken on merits having guided the conclusion on issue of claim being time-barred.

¶22

During the course of hearing, a suggestion came up that the matter to the extent it requires consideration and clear adjudication on the question of limitation be remitted to the Central Commission, the findings on merits as rendered by the impugned order dated 01.11.2019 to be presently kept on hold, reserving the right for the appellant to bring a fresh

¶23

appeal there-against in the event of the Central

¶24

Appeal No. 20 of 2020

¶25

Page 3 of 5

¶26

Commission reiterating its conclusion on the question of limitation. Both sides took adjournment to seek further instructions.

¶27

The learned counsel on both sides have submitted before us today that they are agreeable to such disposal as above of the instant appeal.

¶28

On the foregoing facts, and in the circumstances, and with the consent of both sides, the issue of limitation raised by the Appellant vis-à-vis the claim of DVC in Petition No. 298/MP/2018 brought before the Central Commission is remitted for fresh consideration and decision by the said forum, to be rendered after hearing both parties. Needless to add that the contentions of both sides in such regard are kept open and shall be considered and adjudicated upon comprehensively by the Central Commission in the fresh order that is expected to be passed. It is desirable that the said issue is adjudicated upon, in terms of this remit, at the

¶29

earliest in as much as the decision on merits of the claim,

¶30

as rendered by the order dated 01.11.2019, would be open

¶31

Appeal No. 20 of 2020

¶32

Page 4 of 5

¶33

for fresh challenge by appeal, if the Appellant so desires,

¶34

after decision in the event of adverse decision being rendered on its objection of limitation, such fresh challenge, of course, to be brought within the period of limitation calculated from the date of fresh decision by the Commission. The Respondents assure that the bills which have been presented to the Appellant in the wake of the impugned decision will not be pressed for payment, or recovery, till the issue of limitation is decided upon by the Central Commission in terms of the remit order, this being

¶35

without prejudice to its rights and contentions.

¶36

The parties are directed to appear before the Central

¶37

Commission for further proceedings in light of above directions on 14.04.2020.

¶38

The appeal and applications are disposed of in above terms. Copy of order be given dasti to both sides.

¶39

(Justice R.K. Gauba) (Ravindra Kumar Verma) Judicial Member Technical Member mk

¶40

Appeal No. 20 of 2020

¶41

Page 5 of 5

A.No. 20 of 2020 & Ia No. 2213 of 2019 of West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Limited. v. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.No. 20 of 2020 & Ia No. 2213 of 2019 of West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Limited. v. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.No. 127 of 2019 & Ia No. 540 of 2019 and a.No. 146 of 2019 & Ia No. 627 of 2019 of Madurai Power Corporation Private Limited. Versus Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission & Ors.

A.No. 319 of 2019 & Ia Nos. 1564, 1566 & 1915 of 2019 of M/s. Sudhakara Infratech Private Limited. Versus Uttar Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission & Ors.

A.No. 75 of 2020 & Ia No. 1237 of 2019 & Ia No. 18 of 2020 of Zamil Infra Private Limited. Versus Haryana Power Purchase Centre (Hppc) & Ors.

A.No. 71 of 2020 & Ia Nos. 1758 of 2019 & 489 of 2020 of Sea Shell & Anr. Versus Joint Electricity Regulatory Commission & Ors.

A.Nos. 291 of 2016 and 344 of 2016 of Nlc India Limited. Versus Central Electricity Regulatory Commission, & Ors.

A.Nos. 284 of 2015 & Ia No. 68 of 2016 and 288 of 2015 & Ia No. 69 of 2016 of Indraprastha Power Generation Company Limited. Versus Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission, & Ors.