Sri. Ns Educational Society, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

SRI. NS EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN NADELLA CHANDRAMOULI, S/O. SUBRAMANYAM, AGED 50 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO. 4-260, RAJAJE STREET, MARKAPUR MUNICIPALITY AND MANDAL, MARKAPUR DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

¶10

NADELLA CHANDRAMOULI,, S/O. SUBRAMANYAM, AGED 50 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO. 4-260, RAJAJE STREET, MARKAPUR MUNICIPALITY AND MANDAL, MARKAPUR DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

¶11

...PETITIONER(S)

¶12

AND

¶13

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522238.

¶14

THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MARKAPUR DISTRICT AT MARKAPUR, ERSTWHILE PRAKASAM DISTRICT - 523316.

¶15

THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MARKAPUR REVENUE DIVISION, MARKAPUR DISTRICT ERSTWHILE PRAKASAM DISTRICT - 523316.

¶16

THE TAHSILDAR, PEDDARAVEEDU MANDAL MARKAPUR DISTRICT - 523320.

¶17

2

¶18

BKM,J

¶19

W.P.No.9764 of 2026

¶20

THE MANDAL SURVEYOR, PEDDARAVEEDU MANDAL MARKAPUR DISTRICT - 523320.

¶21

THE VILLAGE SURVEYOR, CHATLAMITTA VILLAGE PEDDARAVEEDU MANDAL, MARKAPUR DISTRICT ERSTWHILE PRAKASAM DISTRICT - 523320.

¶22

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶23

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction on the part of Respondents, more particularly Respondent Nos 4 to 6 on Petitioners F-Line Application vide, its Application No. FSNV012600889351, dated 02.01.2026, submitted for conducting survey and fixation of boundaries for their agricultural landed properties admeasuring total extent of Ac.66. 32 Cents covered by Sy. Nos. 229/IB, 1C, IE, 1G, 1H, 1H1, II, 1J, IK, IQ, IT, 1S of Chatlamitta Revenue Village of Peddaraveedu Mandal, Markapur District, Erstwhile Prakasam District, as illegal, irregular, irrational and amounts to non discharge of legal obligation conferred on them under the provisions of Andhra Pradesh Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923 and Board Standing Order 34-A and 34-B of Andhra Pradesh Board of Revenue Standing Orders and offends Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent Nos 4 to 6 to conduct survey and fix boundaries for the aforesaid landed property and pass

¶24

IA NO: 1 OF 2026

¶25

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents, particularly Respondent No’s 4 to 6 to conduct survey for Petitioners’ agricultural landed property admeasuring total extent of Ac.66. 32 Cents covered by Sy. Nos. 229/ 1B, 1C, IE, 1G, 1H, 1H1, II, 1J, 1K, 1Q, IT, IS of Chatlamitta Revenue Village of Peddaraveedu Mandal, Markapur District, Erstwhile Prakasam District, by considering their F-Line application vide, its No. FSNV012600889351, dated 02.01.2026, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass

¶26

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶27

1.SITA RAM CHAPARLA

¶28

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶29

1.GP FOR REVENUE

¶30

3

¶31

BKM,J W.P.No.9764 of 2026

¶32

The Court made the following Order:

¶33

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents.

¶34

This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents particularly the respondent Nos.4 to 6 in not considering the petitioners’ F-line application dated 02.01.2026 for conducting survey and fixation of boundaries for their agricultural land in the extent of Ac.66.32 cents covered by Sy.Nos.229/1B, 1C, 1E, 1G, 1H, 1H1, 1I, 1J, IK, IQ, IT and 1S of Chatlamitta Revenue Village of Peddaraveedu Mandal, Markapur District, Erstwhile Prakasam District.

¶35

On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue relying upon the written instructions of the 4^th respondent submits that on receipt of F-line application dated 02.01.2026 filed by the petitioners, for conducting survey of the subject land, the 5^th respondent issued advance notice dated 06.01.2026 directing the petitioners and also the adjoining owners/pattadars to attend at the field for conducting survey on 09.01.2026. The boundaries of the subject land could not be fixed, as the adjoining pattadars have not filed their title documents at the time of survey. In view of the same, within the time frame of 15 days, it could not be executed for fixation of the boundaries. However, if the petitioners file fresh application to conduct survey, the same will be acted upon, following the due procedure.

¶36

4

¶37

BKM,J W.P.No.9764 of 2026

¶38

In view of the above said facts and circumstances, and recording the said instructions of the 4^th respondent, the petitioners are permitted to file fresh F-line application before the competent authority, following the due procedure and if so made, the same shall be disposed of in accordance with law. The said instructions of the 4^th respondent shall be made as part of the Court record.

¶39

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶40

As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶41

__________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN

¶42

15.04.2026 PGT

Sri. Ns Educational Society, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri. Ns Educational Society, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Kandi Padmavathi Vs the State of Ap

Singala Somasekhar Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Ganagalla Appalaraju Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Bethi Pedda Pullaiah Vs the State of Ap

M Subramanyam Naidu Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Uppala Audi Lakshmamma Vs State of Andhra Pradesh