Kosu Paramma Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue order or direcion more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 and their subordinate staff in seeking to disposes the petitioner from her house property bearing Door No.2-72/A situated in an extent of Ac 0.05 cts in Sy.No.56 of Vutla Village, Rampachodavaram Mandal, Polavaram District as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere and dispossess the petitioner from her house property without following the due process of law, in the interest of Justice and pass

¶21

IA NO: 1 OF 2026

¶22

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 and their subordinate staff not to interfere and dispossess the petitioner from her house property bearing Door No.2- 72/A situated in an extent of Ac 0.05 cts in Sy.No.56 of Vutla Village, Rampachodavaram Mandal, Polavaram District, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass

¶23

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶24

1.K VENKATESH

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶26

1.GP FOR REVENUE

¶27

2.GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE

¶28

3

¶29

The Court made the following ORDER:

¶30

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent Nos.1 to 3.

¶31

The issuance of notice to the respondent Nos.4 and 5 is dispensed with as no prejudice would cause even if it is disposed of in their absence.

¶32

This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondent Nos.2 and 3 and their subordinate staff in seeking to dispossess the petitioner from her house property bearing Door No.2-72/A situated in an extent of Ac.0.05 cents in Sy.No.56 of Vutla Village, Rampachodavaram Mandal, Polavaram District.

¶33

On the other hand the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the written instructions of the 2^nd respondent dated 07.04.2026 submits that the possession of the writ petitioner has not been disturbed by the 2^nd and 3^rd respondents and their subordinate staff and it is only an allegation leveled for the purpose of this writ petition. They are no way concerned about the subject property of this writ petitioner.

¶34

In view of the above said facts and circumstances and recording the said written instructions dated 07.04.2026, as they are not interfering with the subject property as on date, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. It is made clear that the respondent Nos.2 and 3 shall proceed with the subject property in an extent of Ac.0.05 cents

¶35

4

¶36

in Sy.No.56 of Vutla Village, Rampachodavaram Mandal, Polavaram District, strictly in accordance with law if so warranted for any public purpose.

¶37