Seshaiah Nathani v. The Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ of mandamus under Article 226 for issuance/renewal of passport (file No.VJ2076429789426, dated 19.02.2026) despite pending criminal case; Regional Passport Office Vijayawada; Passports Act 1967 Section 10; Passport Rules 1980 Rule 12; Gazette Notification GSR No.570(E) dated 25.08.1993; ten-year passport validity; undertaking and affidavit not to leave country during pendency; certified copy from trial court; deposit of renewed passport before trial court; trial-court permission to travel abroad; follows common order in W.P.No.5769 of 2026 and batch dated 07.04.2026; Justice Battu Devanand; writ petition allowed; APHC010172862026.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition allowed on the same terms as the common order dated 07.04.2026 in W.P.No.5769 of 2026 and batch: the Passport Authorities to consider and pass appropriate orders on the petitioner's application for issuance/reissuance/renewal of passport for ten (10) years under Section 10 of the Passports Act, 1967, Rule 12 of the Passport Rules, 1980 and Gazette Notification GSR No.570(E) dated 25.08.1993, without reference to the criminal proceedings pending against the petitioner, subject to conditions (undertaking and affidavit not to leave the country during pendency without court permission; trial-court certification within two weeks; submission of certified copy to the Passport Officer, who shall consider the application within two weeks in accordance with law; deposit of the original renewed passport before the concerned trial court; and an application to, and consideration by, the concerned trial court for permission to travel abroad in accordance with law). No order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions, if any, to stand closed.