Nidigunta Adi Lakshmi v. the State of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
Andhra Pradesh High Court at Amaravati; WRIT PETITION NO: 9183/2026; decided 09.07.2026; Bench: Ravi Nath Tilhari, J (author) and Purushottam Kumar Chintalapudi, J. Habeas-corus-style writ under Article 226 by Nidigunta Adi Lakshmi regarding alleged solitary confinement of detenu Nidigunta Aruna at Central Prison, Kadapa and Special Prison for Women, Kadapa; Article 21 violation alleged; IA Nos. 1 and 2 of 2026 under Section 151 CPC. Petitioner's counsel (Sri Syed Khader Masthan) submitted the petition was rendered infructuous; Government Pleader Sri Keerthi Teja Kondaveeti (attached to office of Additional Advocate General) raised no objection. Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; no costs; miscellaneous petitions closed. No precedent cited or discussed; no adjudication on merits of solitary confinement.
What did the court decide?
Recording the petitioner's counsel's submission that the petition had been rendered infructuous and the Government Pleader's lack of objection, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.