Dismissed

Hotha Subramanya Ganapathi v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC9 Apr 2026WP/835/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking reinstatement into service and subsistence allowance was withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel with liberty to file a fresh petition as and when cause of action arises. The court permitted withdrawal, dismissed the petition as withdrawn without costs, and closed pending miscellaneous petitions.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw granted; liberty to file fresh writ petition when cause of action arises; no costs.

Hotha Subramanya Ganapathi Vs the State of… — Service and Employment | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

APHC010009512022

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

[3329]

¶6

FRIDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶7

PRESENT

¶8

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 835/2022

¶9

Between:

¶10

HOTHA SUBRAMANYA GANAPATHI, S/O FIBS SARMA, AGED 49 YEARS, OCC- SERVICE, R/O , 17-31-18, LALITHA NAGAR, TEACHERS COLONY, SIRI PLAZA, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, CO-OPERATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

¶14

THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD, , REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

¶15

THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER FAC, THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD., NO- 2351, P. B. NO- 38, NAGAMALLITHOTA, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT

¶16

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶17

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction on petitioner's representation dated 26.11.2021 submitted for his reinstatement in to service in terms of the statutory provisions under Section 47(6) of Andhra Pradesh Shops and Establishments Act, 1988 and for payment of subsistance allowances etc, as

¶18

¶19

illegal, irregular, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to reinstate petitioner's into service in the post of Manager working in Kothapeta Branch of The District Co-operative Central Bank Ltd of East Godavari District and pass

¶20

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶21

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased

¶22

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶23

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant leave for filling the Counter affidavit by receive it to the record of W.P.No.835 of 2022

¶24

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶25

1.GANTA PRASAD

¶26

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶27

1.GP FOR SERVICES I

¶28

2.SRINIVAS BASAVA

¶29

¶30

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA

¶31

W.P.No.835 of 2022

¶32

This Court made the following

¶33

ORDER:

¶34

Sri K. Ujwal Bharath, learned counsel representing Sri Ganta

¶35

Prasad learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to file a fresh petition as and

¶36

when cause of action arises and also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶37

2. Permission for withdrawal is accorded.

¶38

3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, granting liberty

¶39

to the petitioner to file a fresh petition as and when cause of action arises. No costs.

¶40

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.

¶41

_________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J

¶42

DT: 10.04.2026 krk

¶43

¶44

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA

¶45

131

¶46

W.P.No.835 of 2022

¶47

DT: 10.04.2026

¶48

krk

Hotha Subramanya Ganapathi v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hotha Subramanya Ganapathi v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mandali Lakshmana Rao, Vs Sri M.M. Naik, I.A.S.

N.J. Khannan, Vs Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanam

Rellu Srinivasa Rao, Vs Sri M.M. Naik, I.A.S.

Abburi Seshamma Vs a Rama Reddy

Hotha Subramanya Ganapathi Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

M/s K.C.V.R. Infra Projects, Vs Movva Tirumala Krishna Babu, I.A.S.