Dismissed¶32

Ch. Rusheshwara Raju v. the State of Ap

Andhra Pradesh HC1 Mar 2026WP/6081/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal as infructuous; Writ Petition No.6081 of 2019; High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati; Justice B.V.L.N. Chakravarthi; decision date 02.03.2026; Article 226 mandamus; non-registration of complaint dt.08.04.2019; Station House Officer Kuchipudi; Movva Mandal, Krishna District; petitioner CH. Rusheshwara Raju; respondents CH Jyothi and CH Bhanu; Articles 14, 21 and 300-A; IA No.1 of 2019 under Section 151 CPC; no order as to costs; pending interlocutory applications closed; no merits decided.

What did the court decide?

On recording the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the Writ Petition did not survive for further adjudication and had become infructuous, this Court dismissed the Writ Petition as infructuous, with no order as to costs. ¶32

Ch. Rusheshwara Raju Vs the State of Ap — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

APHC010139762019

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3368] (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 6081/2019

¶7

Between:

¶8

CH. RUSHESHWARA RAJU, S/O. VENKATARAMAIAH, AGED 92 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.5-7, KOSURU VILLAGE, MOVVA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

¶9

...PETITIONER AND

¶10

THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI.

¶11

THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

¶12

THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, AVANIGADDA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

¶13

THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KUCHIPUDI, MOVVA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

¶14

CH JYOTHI, W/O. LATE SRINIVASA RAJU, AGED 44 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.5-7, KOSURU VILLAGE, MOVVA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

¶15

CH BHANU, S/O. LATE SRINIVASA RAJU, AGED 23 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.5-7, KOSURU VILLAGE, MOVVA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

¶16

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶17

¶18

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order, Direction more particularly one the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent herein in not registering the complaint Dt.08.04.2019 given by the petitioner against respondents 5 and 6 is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent to forthwith register the complaint dt.08.04.2019 against respondents 5 and 6 and to pass

¶19

IA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶20

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent to forthwith register the complaint dt.08.04.2019 made by the petitioner against respondents 5 and 6, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶22

1.V VINOD K REDDY

¶23

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶24

1.GP FOR HOME (AP)

¶25

The Court made the following:

¶26

¶27

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI

¶28

WRIT PETITION No.6081 OF 2019

¶29

ORDER:

¶30

Learned counsel representing Sri V.Vinod K. Reddy, learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous.

¶31

Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance.

¶32

Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶33

As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.

¶34

______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI

02.03.2026

Pmk

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI