Disposed¶34

Kosuru Subramanyam v. State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC4 May 2026WP/6017/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

AP High Court Amaravati; Writ Petition 6017/2025; Kosuru Subramanyam and Kosuru Sailaja v. State of Andhra Pradesh and others (incl. Bejjam Rajaji, Dy. SP SC-ST Cell Krishna District, SHO Patamata PS); disposal as infructuous; quashing of charge sheet sought in Crime No. 128/2021 of Patamata Police Station, Vijayawada; pending before III Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Special Court for SC/ST Cases, Vijayawada; Article 226; Articles 14, 19, 21; Section 151 CPC (IA Nos. 1 and 2 of 2025); reference to State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal guidelines; Justice Subhendu Samanta; dated 05.05.2026; no merits holding.

What did the court decide?

Taking note of the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners that the matter had become infructuous, the Court disposed of the instant writ petition as infructuous. ¶34

Kosuru Subramanyam Vs State of Andhra Pradesh — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

APHC010105722025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

[3560]

¶5

TUESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 6017/2025

¶8

Between:

¶9

KOSURU SUBRAMANYAM, S/O K APPA RAO, AGED ABOUT 58 YRS, OCCUPATION. BUSINESS, R/O 30-9-1, DURGA AGRAHARAM, KOSURU STREET, VIJAYAWADA 520002,

¶10

KOSURU SAILAJA,, W/O KOSURU SUBRAHMANYAM, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O D.NO.30-9-1, NAMBURU VARI STREET, DURGA AGRAHARAM, VIJAYAWADA.

¶11

...PETITIONER(S)

¶12

AND

¶13

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI

¶14

THE DEPUTY SUPERINTEDNENT OF POLICE, SC ST CELL DEPARTMENT, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

¶15

THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PATAMATA POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA DISTRICT.

¶16

BEJJAM RAJAJI, S/O SUNDAR RAO, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

¶17

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶18

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction in the nature of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ quashing the Charge Sheet

¶19

in Crime No. 128/2021 of Patamata Police Station, pending before the Hon'ble III Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Special Court for SC/ST Cases, Vijayawada and 3rd Respondent as illegal, arbitrary and abuse of process Law and a threat to the morality besides being hit by Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently quash the abusive FIR by directing the Respondents to not to proceed further in the said crime supra including not to take coercive steps against the petitioners and to grant

¶20

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶21

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense from filing certified copies of FIR and charge sheet to grant

¶22

IA NO: 2 OF 2025

¶23

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 to followthe guidelines laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lai [(1992) Supp (1) see 335],pending disposal of the W.P. and to grant

¶24

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶25

1.K.S BALA SAI TEJA

¶26

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶27

1.GP FOR HOME

¶28

The Court made the following:

¶29

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA