Vandadi Venkateswarulu, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh rep., by its Principal Secretary
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous by efflux of time (AP High Court, Amaravati; Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao, J.; Writ Petition No.5785 of 2016; order dated 19.06.2026). Challenge to Endowments Department Letter No.136997(Endts.II(1)/2015 dated 18-02-2016 rejecting restoration of the Trust Board period of Sri Veera Bhadra Swamy Temple, Rayachoty; Trust Board appointed by G.O.Rt.No.105 dated 01-02-2014; Act No.8 of 2014 earlier struck down in W.P. No.29I89 of 2014 and batch (order dated 30-12-2014); Articles 14, 19, 21 and 226 invoked; no order as to costs; pending IAs closed; no merits adjudication.
What did the court decide?
On the statement of learned counsel for the petitioners that the writ petition is rendered infructuous by efflux of time, the Court recorded the same and dismissed the writ petition as infructuous. ¶33