Pamulapati Sai Krishna, v. The Union of India
Passport – Renewal – Writ of Mandamus under Article 226
Case brief
What is this about?
APHC W.P. No.5555 of 2026, Pamulapati Sai Krishna v. Union of India and others (decided 08.04.2026, Battu Devanand, J.). Challenge to non-renewal of passport No.P0262033 (application No.25-1064034056 dated 23.10.2025) as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the Passport Act, 1967 and Passport Rules, 1980; mandamus sought under Article 226. Matter held covered by common order in W.P.No.5602 of 2026 and batch dated 07.04.2026; petition allowed on same terms with conditions regarding charge sheets and revocation. Counsel: Srinivasu L for petitioner; GP for Home and M Madaalasa, Central Government Counsel, for respondents. Related: IA No.1 of 2026 under Section 151 CPC.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition allowed on the same terms as the common order in W.P.No.5602 of 2026 and batch dated 07.04.2026, i.e., Passport Authorities directed to issue/re-issue/renew the petitioner's passport, subject to the conditions therein (orders from the concerned Court required if charge sheets are filed; revocation possible after due notice if such steps are not taken); no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.