Manjeera Consiruction Ltd., Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

MANJEERA CON S TRUCTION LTD.,, A DULY IN C ORPORATED COMPANY, NO. 711, MANJEERA TRINITY CORPORATE, JNTU, HITECH CITY RO A D, KUKATPALLY, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA, REP BY ITS MAN A GING DIRECTOR SRI G. YOGAN A ND, SIO LATE SRI G. CHENNAK E SAVULU

¶12

...PETITIONER

¶13

AND

¶14

THE STATE OF A NDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY I T S PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, R EVENUE DEPARTMENT, S ECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AM A RAVATHI, GUNTUR.

¶15

THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF T H E DISTRICT REGISTRAR, KRI S HNA DISTRICT, PANTA KALUVA R OAD, MARUTI COLONY, PATAM A TA, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH.

¶16

THE JOINT SUBREGISTRAR 627 RO OB, OFFICE OF THE SUB REGISTRAR, G ANDHI NAGAR, NEAR TAL U KA OFFICE, HANUMANPET, VI J AYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH 520 003.

¶17

MAGANTI SUB R AHMANYAM CHOWDRY, S/ O MAGANTI MALLIKARJUNA R A O, AGED 62 YEARS, OCC- DOCTOR, R/O FLAT

¶18

2

¶19

CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.Nos.4724, 4737, 4738, 4739, 4741, 4779, 4782,

¶20

4785, 4789, 4791 and 4799 of 2020

¶21

NO.5-6, D.NO. 59-8-7, VASUDHA APARTMENT, GAYATRINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA.

¶22

D MAGANTI ADARSH, S/O M.SUBRAHMANYAM CHOWDRY, AGED 36YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O FLAT NO. 5-6, D.NO. 59-8-7, VASUDHA APARTMENTS, GAYATHRINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA.

¶23

MAGANTI ANOOHYA, W/O VALIUM KRISHNA SAROSH, AGED 29 YEARS, OCC- SERVICE, TEMPORARY R/O APT. NO.206, 19, STATION ROAD, NEW BERNET, HERTFORD SHIRE, ENS, IQJ, UNITED KINGDOM, REP BY HER GPA HOLDER MR. MAGANTI ADARSH, SIO SUBRAMANYAM CHOWDRY, R/O FLAT NO. 5-6, D.NO.59-8-7, VASUDHA APARTMENTS, GAYATHRINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA

¶24

SONTI HEMANTH KUMAR, WO SRI SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O 1-35, WARD NO.1, MELLAMPUDI, TEDEPALLI MANDALAM, NUTAKKI, GUNTUR 522 303

¶25

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶26

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus, order or any appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 in refusing the registration of sale deed dated 21-6-2019 bearing P No.2987/2019 executed by the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the Respondent No.7 by its 'Refusal Order' No.29/2019, dated 13-9-2019, and also the action of the Respondent No.2 in confirming the said Refusal Order passed by the Respondent No.3, by dismissing the appeal preferred by the Petitioner under Appeal No.8 of 2019, dated 4-1-2020, as arbitrary and illegal, and for further direction to direct the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 herein to register the sale deed dated 21-6-2019 bearing P No.2987 of 2019 executed by the Petitioner and the Respondents 4, to 6 in favour of the Respondent No.7, and to release the same without any delay thereafter in the interest of justice

¶27

IA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶28

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass interim orders suspending the order passed in Appeal No.8 of 2019, dated 4-1-2020 passed by the Respondent No.2 herein and also the Refusal

¶29

3

¶30

CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.Nos.4724, 4737, 4738, 4739, 4741, 4779, 4782,

¶31

4785, 4789, 4791 and 4799 of 2020

¶32

Order No.2912019 dated 13-9-2019, passed by the Respondent No.3 in respect of the sale deed dated 21-06-2019 bearing P No.29871 2019, executed and presented by the Petitioner and; the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the Respondent No.7, and consequently direct the Respondent No.3 to register the sale deed dated 21-6-2019 bearing P No.2987/2019 executed by the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the Respondent No.7, pending disposal of the above said writ petition in the interest of justice,

¶33

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶34

1.D SRINIVAS PRASAD

¶35

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶36

¶37

2.M R K CHAKRAVARTHY

¶38

WRIT PETITION NO: 4737 OF 2020

¶39

Between:

¶40

MANJEERA CONSTRUCTION LTD.,, A DULY INCORPORATED COMPANY, NO. 711, MANJEERA TRINITY CORPORATE, JNTU, HITECH CITY ROAD, KUKATPALLY, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA, REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI G. YOGANAND, S/O LATE SRI G. CHENNAKESAVULU

¶41

...PETITIONER

¶42

AND

¶43

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR.

¶44

THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, PANTAKALUVA ROAD, MARUTI COLONY, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH.

¶45

THE JOINT SUBREGISTRAR 627 RO, (OB), OFFICE OF THE SUB REGISTRAR, GANDHI NAGAR, NEAR TALUKA OFFICE, HANUMANPET, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH 520 003.

¶46

4

¶47

CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.Nos.4724, 4737, 4738, 4739, 4741, 4779, 4782,

¶48

4785, 4789, 4791 and 4799 of 2020

¶49

MAGANTI SUBRAHMANYAM CHOWDRY, S/O MAGANTIMALLIKARJUNA RAO, AGED 62 YEARS, OCC. DOCTOR, R/O FLAT NO.5-6, D.NO. 59-8-7, VASUDHA APARTMENT, GAYATRINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA.

¶50

MAGANTI ADARSH, S/O M.SUBRAHMANYAMCHOWDRY, AGED 36YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O FLAT NO. 5-6, D.NO. 59-8-7, VASUDHA APARTMENTS, GAYATHRINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA.

¶51

MAGANTIANOOHYA, W/O VALLURU KRISHNA SARA H, AGED 29 YEARS, OCC. SERVICE, T TEMPORARY R O APT. NO.206, 19, STATION ROAD, NEW BERNET, HERTFORD SHIRE, ENS, IQJ, UNII.ED KINGDOM, REP BY HER GPA HOLDER MR. MAGANTI ADARSH, S/O SUBRAMANYAM CHOWDRY, R/O FLAT NO. 5-6, D.NO.59-8-7, VASUDHA APARTMENTS, GAYATHRINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA

¶52

JALUMARI LAXRNI SIVA PRASAD BALARAMARAJU, S/O SRI J KASINLU, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O FLAT NO.201, APARNA HEIGHTS-2, BOTANICAL GARDEN ROAD, LAXMI NAGAR, KONDAPUR, HYDERABAD-500 084

¶53

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶54

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus, order or any appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 in refusing the registration of sale deed dated 27.6-2019 bearing P No.3076/2019 executed by the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the Respondent No.7 by its 'Refusal Order' No.30/2019, dated 13-9-2019, and also the action of the Respondent No.2 in confirming the said Refusal Order passed by the Respondent No.3, by dismissing the appeal preferred by the Petitioner under Appeal No.10 of 2019, dated 4-1-2020, as arbitrary and illegal, and for further direction tc direct the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 herein to register the sale deed dated 27-6-2019 bearing P No.3076/2019 executed by the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the Respondent No.7, and to release the same without any delay thereafter in the interest of justice, and pass

¶55

5

¶56

CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.Nos.4724, 4737, 4738, 4739, 4741, 4779, 4782, 4785, 4789, 4791 and 4799 of 2020

¶57

IA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶58

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass interim orders suspending the order passed in Appeal No.10 of 2019, dated 4-1-2020 passed by the Respondent No.2 herein and also the Refusal Order No.30/2019 dated 13-9-2019, passed by the Respondent No.3 in respect of the' sale deed dated 27-06-2019 bearing P No.3076/ 2019, executed and presented by the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the Respondent No.7, and consequently direct the Respondent No.3 to register the sale deed dated 27-6- 2019 bearing P No.3076/2019 executed by the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 to 6 favour of the Respondent No.7, pending disposal of the above said writ petition in the interest of justice, and pass

¶59

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶60

1.D SRINIVAS PRASAD

¶61

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶62

1.GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP)

¶63

2.M R K CHAKRAVARTHY

¶64

WRIT PETITION NO: 4738 OF 2020

¶65

Between:

¶66

MANJEERA CONSTRUCTION LTD.,, A DULY INCORPORATED COMPANY, NO. 711, MANJEERA TRINITY CORPORATE, JNTU, HITECH CITY ROAD, KUKATPALLY, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA, REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI G. YOGANAND, SIO LATE SRI G. CHENNAKESAVULU

¶67

...PETITIONER

¶68

AND

¶69

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR.

¶70

6

¶71

CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.Nos.4724, 4737, 4738, 4739, 4741, 4779, 4782,

¶72

4785, 4789, 4791 and 4799 of 2020

¶73

THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, PANTA KALUVA ROAD, MARUTI COLONY, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH.

¶74

THE JOINT SUBREGISTRAR 627 RO 08, OFFICE OF THE SUB REGISTRAR, GANDHI NAGAR, NEAR TALUKA OFFICE, HANUMANPET, VIJ AYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH 520 003.

¶75

MAGANTI SUBRAHMANYAM CHOWDRY, S/O MAGANTI MALLIKARJUNA RAO, AGED 62 YEARS, OCC- DOCTOR, R/O FLAT NO.5-6, D.NO. 59-8-7, VASUDHA APARTMENT, GAYATRINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA.

¶76

MAGANTI ADARSH, S/O M.SUBPHMANYAM CHOWDRY, AGED 36YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, RIO FLAT NO. 5-6, D.NO. 59-8-7, VASUDHA APARTMENTS, GAYATHRINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA.

¶77

MAGANTI ANOOHYA, W/O VALLURU KRISHNA SAROSH, AGED 29 YEARS, OCC- SERVICE, TEMPORARY R/O APT. NO.206, 19, STATION ROAD, NEW BERNET, HERTFORD SHIRE, EN5, IQJ, UNITED KINGDOM, REP BY HER GPA HOLDER MR. MAGANTI ADARSH, S/O SUBRAMANYAM CHOWDRY, R/O FLAT NO. 5-6, D.NO.59-8-7, VASUDHA APARTMENTS, GAYATHRINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA

¶78

K SRIDHAR, S/O SRI K S R BRAHMAM, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O FLAT NO.308, SMR. VINAY SKY CITY, OPP HPS, RAMANTHAPUR, HYDERABAD

¶79

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶80

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus, order or any appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 in refusing the registration of sale deed dated 21-6-2019 bearing P No.2988/2019 executed by the Petitioner and the Respondents 41to 6 in favour of the Respondent No.7 by its 'Refusal Order' No.28/2019, dated 13-9-2019, and also the action of the Respondent No.2 in confirming the said Refusal Order passed by the Respondent No.3, by dismissing the appeal preferred by the Petitioner under Appeal No.9 of 2019, dated 4-1-2020, as arbitrary and illegal, and for further direction to direct the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 herein to register the sale deed dated 21-6-2019

¶81

7

¶82

CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.Nos.4724, 4737, 4738, 4739, 4741, 4779, 4782, 4785, 4789, 4791 and 4799 of 2020

¶83

bearing P No.2988/2019 executed by the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the Respondent No.7, and to release the same without any delay thereafter in the interest of justice

¶84

IA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶85

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass interim orders suspending the order passed in Appeal No.9 of 2019, dated 4-1-2020 passed by the Respondent No.2 herein and also the Refusal Order NIo.28/2019 dated 13-9-2019, passed by the Respondent No.3 in respect of the sale deed dated 21-06-2019 bearing P No.2988/ 2019, executed and presented by the Petitioner and I the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the Respondent No.7, and consequently direct the Respondent No.3 to register the sale deed dated 21-6-2019 bearing P No.2988/2019 executed by the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the Respondent No.7, pending disposal of the above said writ petition in the interest of justice

¶86

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶87

1.D SRINIVAS PRASAD

¶88

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶89

1.GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP)

¶90

2.M R K CHAKRAVARTHY

¶91

WRIT PETITION NO: 4739 OF 2020

¶92

Between:

¶93

MANJEERA CONSTRUCTION LTD.,, A DULY INCORPORATED COMPANY, NO. 711, MANJEERA TRINITY CORPORATE, JNTU, HITECH CITY ROAD, KUKATPALLY, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA, REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI G. YOGANAND, SIO LATE SRI G. CHENNAKESAVULU

...PETITIONER

AND

8

CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.Nos.4724, 4737, 4738, 4739, 4741, 4779, 4782,

¶98

4785, 4789, 4791 and 4799 of 2020

¶99

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR.

¶100

THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, PANTA KALUVA ROAD, MARUTI COLONY, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH.

¶101

THE JOINT SUBREGISTRAR 627, RO (OB), OFFICE OF THE SUB REGISTRAR, GANDHI NAGAR, NEAR TALUKA OFFICE, HANUMANPET, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH 520 003.

¶102

MAGANTI SUBRAHMANYAM CHOWDRY, , S/O MAGANTI MALLIKARJUNA RAO, AGED 62 YEARS, OCC. DOCTOR, R/O FLAT NO.5-6, D.NO. 59-8-7, VASUDHA APARTMENT, GAYATRINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA.

¶103

MAGANTI ADARSH, S/O M.SUBRAHMANYAM CHOWDRY, AGED 36YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O FLAT NO. 5-6, D,NO. 59-8-7, VASUDHA APARTMENTS, GAYATHRINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA.

¶104

MAGANTI ANOOHYA, W/O VALLURU KRISHNA SAROSH, AGED 29 YEARS, OCC. SERVICE, TEMPORARY R/O APT. NO.206, 19, STATION ROAD, NEW BERNET, HERTFORD SHIRE, ENS, IQJ, UNITED KINGDOM, REP BY HER GPA HOLDER MR. MAGANTI ADARSH, SIC) SUBRAMANYAM CHOWDTY, R/O FLAT NO. 5-6, D.NO.59-8-7, VASUDHA APARTMENTS, GAYATHRINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA.

¶105

N VENU BABU, S/O SRI CHINNA SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O 2-31, NARNEVARIPALEM POST, J PONGULURU MANDALAM, PRAKASHAM, DISTRICT 523 261

¶106

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶107

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus, order or any appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 in refusing the registration of sale deed dated 17-6-2019 bearing P No.2874 of 2019 by its 'Refusal Order' No.22/2019, dated 13-9-2019, and also the action of the Respondent No.2 in confirming the said Refusal Order passed by the Respondent No.3, by

¶108

9

¶109

CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.Nos.4724, 4737, 4738, 4739, 4741, 4779, 4782,

¶110

4785, 4789, 4791 and 4799 of 2020

¶111

dismissing the appeal preferred by the Petitioner under Appeal No.5 of 2019, dated 4-1-2020, as arbitrary and illegal, and for further direction to direct the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 herein to register the sale deed dated 17-6-2019 bearing P No. 2874 of 2019 executed by the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the Respondent No.7, and to release the same without any delay thereafter in the interest of justice,

¶112

IA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶113

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass interim orders suspending the order passed in Appeal No.5 of 2019, dated 4-1-2020 passed by the Respondent No.2 herein and also the Refusal Order No.22/2019 dated 13-9-2019, passed by the Respondent No.3 in respect of the sole iII deed dated 17L06-2019 bearing P No.2874 of 2019, executed and presented by the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the Respondent No.7, and consequently direct the Respondent No.3 to register the sale deed dated 17-6-2019 executed by the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the Respondent No.7, pending disposal of the above said writ petition in the interest of justice

¶114

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶115

1.D SRINIVAS PRASAD

¶116

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶117

1.GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP)

¶118

2.M R K CHAKRAVARTHY

¶119

WRIT PETITION NO: 4741 OF 2020

¶120

Between:

¶121

MANJEERA CONSTRUCTION LTD.,, A DULY INCORPORATED COMPANY, NO. 711, MANJEERA TRINITY CORPORATE, JNTU, HITECH CITY ROAD, KUKATPALLY, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA, REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI G. YOGANAND, S/O LATE SRI G. CHENNAKESAVULU

¶122

...PETITIONER

¶123

10

¶124

CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.Nos.4724, 4737, 4738, 4739, 4741, 4779, 4782,

¶125

4785, 4789, 4791 and 4799 of 2020

¶126

AND

¶127

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR.

¶128

THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, PANTA KALUVA ROAD, MARUTI COLONY, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH.

¶129

THE JOINT SUBREGISTRAR 627 RO OB, OFFICE OF THE SUB REGISTRAR, GANDHI NAGAR, NEAR TALUKA OFFICE, HANUMANPET, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH 520 003.

¶130

MAGANTI SUBRAHMANYAM CHOWDRY, S/O MAGANTI MALLIKARJUNA RAO, AGED 62 YEARS, OCC. DOCTOR, R/O FLAT NO.5-6, D.NO. 59-8-7, VASUDHA APARTMENT, GAYATRINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA.

¶131

MAGANTI ADARSH, S/O M.SUBRAHMANYAM CHOWDRY, AGED 36YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O FLAT NO. 5-6, D.NO. 59-8-7, VASUDHA APARTMENTS, GAYATHRINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA.

¶132

MAGANTI ANOOHYA, W/O VALLURU KRISHNA SAROSH, AGED 29 YEARS, OCC. SERVICE, TEMPORARY R/O APT. NO.206, 19, STATION ROAD, NEW BERNET, HERTFORD SHIRE, ENS, IQJ, UNITED KINGDOM, REP BY HER GPA HOLDER MR. MAGANTI ADARSH, S/O SUBRAMANYAM CHOWDRY, R/O FLAT NO. 5-6, D.NO.59-8-7, VASUDHA APARTMENTS, GAYATHRINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA

¶133

PULIGADDA VENL ATA NAGA KRISHNA KISHORE, S/O SRI P HAYAGREEVA RAO, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O 41-1/5-51, INDIRA COLONY, KRISHNA LANKA, VIJAYAWADA

¶134

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶135

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus, order or any appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 in refusing the registration of sale deed dated 74-2019 bearing No.2742/2019 executed by the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the Respondent No.7 by its 'Refusal Order'

¶136

11

¶137

CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.Nos.4724, 4737, 4738, 4739, 4741, 4779, 4782, 4785, 4789, 4791 and 4799 of 2020

¶138

No.26/2019, dated 13-9-2019, and also the action of the Respondent No.2 in confirming the said Refusal Order passed by the Respondent No.3, by dismissing the appeal preferred by the Petitioner under Appeal No.11 of 2019, dated 4-1-2020, as arbitrary and illegal, and for further direction to direct the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 herein to register the sale deed dated 7-6-2019. bearing P No.2742/2019 executed by the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the Respondent No.7, and to release the same without any delay thereafter in the interest of justice, and pass

¶139

IA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶140

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass interim orders suspending the order passed in Appeal No.11 of 2019, dated 4-1-2020 passed by the Respondent No.2 herein and also the Refusal Order No.26/2019 dated 13-9-2019, passed by the Respondent No.3 in respect of the sale deed dated 7-06-2019 bearing. P No.2742/ 2019, executed and presented by the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the Respondent No.7, and consequently direct the Respondent No.3 to register the sale deed dated 7-6¬2019 bearing 11 No.2742/2019 executed by the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the Respondent No.7, pending disposal of the above said writ petition in the interest of justice, and pass

¶141

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶142

1.D SRINIVAS PRASAD

¶143

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶144

1.GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP)

¶145

2.M R K CHAKRAVARTHY

¶146

WRIT PETITION NO: 4779 OF 2020

¶147

Between:

¶148

MANJEERA CONSTRUCTION LTD.,, A DULY INCORPORATED COMPANY, NO. 711, MANJEERA TRINITY CORPORATE, JNTU, HITECH CITY ROAD, KUKATPALLY, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA, REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI G. YOGANAND, SIC) LATE

¶149

12

¶150

CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.Nos.4724, 4737, 4738, 4739, 4741, 4779, 4782,

¶151

4785, 4789, 4791 and 4799 of 2020

¶152

SRI G. CHENNAKESAVULU

¶153

...PETITIONER

¶154

AND

¶155

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR.

¶156

THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, PANTA KALUVA ROAD, MARUTI COLONY, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH.

¶157

THE JOINT SUBREGISTRAR, - 627 RO (OB), OFFICE OF THE SUB REGISTRAR, GANDHI NAGAR, NEAR TALUKA OFFICE, HANUMANPET, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH 520 003.

¶158

MAGANTI SUBRAHMANYAM CHOWDRY, SIO MAGANTI MALLIKARJUNA RAO, AGED 62 YEARS, OCC DOCTOR, R/O FLAT NO.5-6, D.NO. 59-8-7, VASUDHA APARTMENT, GAYATRINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA.

¶159

MAGANTI ADARSH, S/0 M.SUBRAHMANYAM CHOWDRY, AGED 36YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O FLAT NO. 5-6, D.NO. 59-8-7, VASUDHA APARTMENTS, GAYATHRINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA.

¶160

MAGANTI ANOOHYA, W/O VALIUM KRISHNA SAROSH, AGED 29 YEARS, OCC SERVICE, TEMPORARY R/O APT. NO.206, 19, STATION ROAD, NEW BERNET, HERTFORD SHIRE, EN5, IQJ, UNITED KINGDOM, REP BY HER GPA HOLDER MR. MAGANTI ADARSH, S/O SUBRAMANYAM CHOWDRY, R/O FLAT NO. 5-6, D.NO.59-8-7, VASUDHA APARTMENTS, GAYATHRINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA

¶161

SMT PVSRN BHAVANI, W/O SRI PUCHA TEJASWI, GED ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/O2-22-148/603, SAI K SHNA TOWERS, BAGYANAGAR COLONY, KUKATPALLY, HYDERABAD.

¶162

PUCHA TEJASWI, S/O SRI PUCHA SHYAM SUNDER, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O2-22-148/603, SAI KRISHNA TOWERS, BAGYANAGAR COLONY, KUKATPALLY, HYDERABAD.

¶163

13

¶164

CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.Nos.4724, 4737, 4738, 4739, 4741, 4779, 4782,

¶165

4785, 4789, 4791 and 4799 of 2020

¶166

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶167

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus, order or any appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 in refusing the registration of sale deed dated 7-6-2019 bearing P No.2711 of 2019 executed by the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the Respondent Nos.7 and 8 by its 'Refusal Order' No.23/2019, dated 13-9-2019, and alsO the action of the Respondent No.2 in confirming the said Refusal Order passed by the Respondent No.3, by dismissing the appeal preferred by the Petitioner under Appeal No.1 of 2019, dated 4-1-2020, as arbitrary and illegal, and for further direction to direct the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 herein to register the sale deed dated 7-6-2019 bearing P No. 2711 of 2019 executed by the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the Respondent Nos.7 and 8, and to release the same without any delay thereafter in the interest of justice,

¶168

IA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶169

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass interim orders suspending the order passed in Appeal No.1 of 2019, dated 4-1-2020 passed by the Respondent No.2 herein and also the Refusal Order No.23/2019 dated 13-9-2019, passed by the Respondent No.3 in respect of the sale deed (lilted 7-06-2019 bearing P No.2711 of 2019, executed and presented by the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the Respondent Nos.7& 8, and consequently direct the Respondent No.3 to register the sale deed dated 7-6-2019 bearing P No.2711/2019 executed by the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the Respondent Nos.7& 8, pending disposal of the above said writ petition in the interest of justice, and piss

¶170

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶171

1.D SRINIVAS PRASAD

¶172

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶173

1.GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP)

¶174

2.M R K CHAKRAVARTHY

¶175

14

¶176

CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.Nos.4724, 4737, 4738, 4739, 4741, 4779, 4782,

¶177

4785, 4789, 4791 and 4799 of 2020

¶178

WRIT PETITION NO: 4782 OF 2020

¶179

Between:

¶180

MANJEERA CONSTRUCTION LTD.,, A DULY INCORPORATED COMPANY, NO. 711, MANJEERA TRINITY CORPORATE, JNTU, HITECH CITY ROAD, KUKATPALLY, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA, REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI G. YOGANAND, SIC) LATE SRI G. CHENNAKESAVULU

¶181

...PETITIONER

¶182

AND

¶183

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR.

¶184

THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, PANTAKALUVA ROAD, MARUTI COLONY, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH.

¶185

THE JOINT SUBREGISTRAR 627 RO OB, OFFICE OF THE SUB REGISTRAR, GANDHI NAGAR, NEAR TALUKA OFFICE, HANUMANPET, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH 520 003.

¶186

MAGANTI SUBRAHMANYAM CHOWDRY, S/O MAGANTIMALLIKARJUNA RAO, AGED 62 YEARS, OCC. DOCTOR, R/O FLAT NO.5-6, D.NO. 59-8-7, VASUDHA APARTMENT, GAYATRINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA.

¶187

MAGANTI ADARSH, S/O M.SUBRAHMANYAMCHOWDRY, AGED 36YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O FLAT NO. 5-6, D.NO. 59-8-7, VASUDHA APARTMENTS, GAYATHRINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA.

¶188

MAGANTIANOOHYA, W/O VALLURU KRISHNA SAROSH, AGED 29 YEARS, OCC. SERVICE, TEMPORARY R/O APT. NO.206, 19, STATION ROAD, NEW BERNE, HERTFORD SHIRE, ENS, IQJ, UNITED KINGDOM, REP BY HER GPA HOLDER MR. MAGANTI ADARSH, S/O SUBRAMANYAM CHOWDRY, R/O FLAT NO. 5-6, D.NO.59-8-7, VASUDHA APARTMENTS, GAYATHRINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA

¶189

15

¶190

CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.Nos.4724, 4737, 4738, 4739, 4741, 4779, 4782,

¶191

4785, 4789, 4791 and 4799 of 2020

¶192

PHANENDRA KUMAR JAIN, S/O SRI RAJESH KUMAR JAIN, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,

¶193

SMT NALINI KUN ARI CHODAGUDI, W/O SRI PHANENDRA KUMAR JAIN, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, RESPONDENTS 7 AND 8 REP BY THEIR GPA HOLDER SMT TARA JAIN, VILO SRI RAJESH KUMAR JAIN, R/O FLAT NO.601, GANESH RESIDENCY, SRIRAM NAGAR, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT - 521 301

¶194

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶195

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus, order or any appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 in refusing the registration of sale deed dated 18-6-2019 bearing P No.2911 of 2019 executed by the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the Respondent Nos.7 and 8 by its 'Refusal Order' No.24/2019, dated .3-9-2019, and also the action of the Respondent No.2 in confirming the said Refusal Order passed by the Respondent No.3, by dismissing the appeal preferred by the Pe .itioner under Appeal No.7 of 2019, dated 4-1-2020, as arbitrary and illegal, and for further direction to direct the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 herein to register the sale deed dated 18-6-2019 bearing P No.2911/2019 executed by the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the Respondent Nos.7 and 8, and to release the same without any delay thereafter in the interest of justice, and pass

¶196

IA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶197

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass interim orders suspending the order passed in Appeal No.7 of 2019, 'dated 4-1-2020 passed by the Respondent No.2 herein and also the Refusal Order No.24/2019 dated 13-9-2019, passed by the Respondent No.3 in respect of the sale deed dated 18-06-2019 bearing P No.2911 of 2019, executed and presented by the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the Respondent Nos.7& 8, and consequently direct the Respondent No.3 to register the sale deed dated 18-6-2019 bearing P No.2911/2019 executed by the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the Respondent Nos.7& 8, pending disposal of the above said writ petition in the interest of justice

¶198

16

¶199

CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.Nos.4724, 4737, 4738, 4739, 4741, 4779, 4782,

¶200

4785, 4789, 4791 and 4799 of 2020

¶201

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶202

1.D SRINIVAS PRASAD

¶203

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶204

1.GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP)

¶205

2.M R K CHAKRAVARTHY

¶206

WRIT PETITION NO: 4785 OF 2020

¶207

Between:

¶208

MANJEERA CONSIRUCTION LTD.,, A DULY INCORPORITED COMPANY, NO. 711, MANGY ERA TRINITY CORPORATE, JNTU, HITECH ITY ROAD, KUKATPALLY, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA, REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI G. YAGANAND, SIC) LATE SRI G. CHENNAKESAVULU

¶209

...PETITIONER

¶210

AND

¶211

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR.

¶212

THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, PANTAKALUVA ROAD, MARUTI COLONY, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH.

¶213

THE JOINT SUBREGISTRAR 627 RO OB, OFFICE OF THE SUB REGISTRAR, GANDHI NAGAR, NEAR TALUKA OFFICE, HANUMANPET, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH 520 003.

¶214

MAGANTI SUBRAHMANYAM CHOWDRY, S/O MAGANTIMALLIKARJUNA RAO, AGED 62 YEARS, OCC- DOCTOR', R/O FLAT NO.5-6, D.NO. 59-8-7, VASUDHA APARTMENT, GAYATRINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA.

¶215

MAGANTI AFLARSH, S/O M.SUBIIAHMANYAM CHOWDARY, AGED 36.YEARS, ACE- BUSINESS, R/O FLAT NO. 5-6, D.NO. 59-8-7,

¶216

17

¶217

CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.Nos.4724, 4737, 4738, 4739, 4741, 4779, 4782,

¶218

4785, 4789, 4791 and 4799 of 2020

¶219

VASUDHA APARTMENTS, GAYATHRINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA.

¶220

MAGANTIANOOHYA, W/O VALIUM KRISHNA SAR SH, AGED 29 YEARS, OCC- SERVICE, TEMPORARY R/O APT. NO.206, 19, STATION ROAD, NEW BERNET, HERTFORD SHIRE, ENS, IQJ, UNITED KINGDOM, REP BY HER GPA HOLDER MR. MAGANTI ADARSH, S/0 SUBRAMANYAM CHOWDRY, R/O FLAT NO. 5-6, D.NO.59-8-7, VASUDHA APARTMENTS, GAYATHRINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA

¶221

SURE GANESH KUMAR, S/O SRI NAGESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC-CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT, R/O FLAT NO.B-105. 40-17-3/10, BOPANNASVALLURU EMPIRE, KATRAGADDAPITCHAIAH STREET, LABBIPET, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT-520 010

¶222

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶223

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus, order or any appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 in refusing the registration of sale deed dated 14-6-2019 bearing P No.2863 of 2019 by its 'Refusal Order' No.20/2019, d4ted 13-9-2019, and also the action of the Respondent No.2 in confirming the said Refusal Order passed by the Respondent No.3, by dismissing the appeal preferred by the Petitioner under Appeal No.3 of 2019, dated 4-1-2020, as arbitrary and illegal, and for further direction to direct the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 herein to registe7- the sale deed dated 14-6-2019 bearing P No. 2863 of 2019 executed by the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the Respondent No.7, and to release the same without any delay thereafter in the interest of justice,

¶224

IA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶225

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass interim orders suspending the order passed in Appeal Nol of 2019, dated 4-1-2020 passed by the Respondent No.2 herein and also the Refusal Order No.20/2019 dated 13-9-2019, passed by the Respondent No.3 in respect of the sale deed dated 14-06-2019 bearing P No.2863 of 2019, executed and presented by the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the

¶226

18

¶227

CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.Nos.4724, 4737, 4738, 4739, 4741, 4779, 4782,

¶228

4785, 4789, 4791 and 4799 of 2020

¶229

Respondent No.7, and consequently direct the Respondent N9.3 to register the sale deed dated 14-6-2019 executed by the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the Respondent No.7, pending disposal of the above said writ petition in the interest of justice,

¶230

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶231

1.D SRINIVAS PRASAD

¶232

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶233

1.GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP)

¶234

2.M R K CHAKRAVARTHY

¶235

WRIT PETITION NO: 4789 OF 2020

¶236

Between:

¶237

MANJEERA CONSTRUCTION LTD, A DULY INCORPORATED COMPANY, NO. 711, MANJEERA TRINITY CORPORATE, INTU, HITECH CITY ROAD, KUKATPALLY, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA, REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI G. YOGANAND, S/O LATE SRI G. CHENNAKESAVULU

¶238

...PETITIONER

¶239

AND

¶240

THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR.

¶241

THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, PANTA KALUVA ROAD, MARUTI COLONY, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH.

¶242

THE JOINT SUBREGISTRAR 627 RO OB, OFFICE OF THE SUB REGISTRAR, GANDHI NAGAR, NEAR TALUKA OFFICE, HANUMANPET, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH 520 003.

¶243

MAGANTI SUBRAHMANYAM CHOWDRY, S/O MAGANTI MALLIKARJUNA RAO, AGED 62 YEARS, OCC. DOCTOR, R/O FLAT NO.5-6, D.NO. 59-8-7, VASUDHA APARTMENT, GAYATRINAGAR,

¶244

19

¶245

CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.Nos.4724, 4737, 4738, 4739, 4741, 4779, 4782,

¶246

4785, 4789, 4791 and 4799 of 2020

¶247

VIJAYAWADA.

¶248

MAGANTI ADARSH, S/O M.SUBRAHMANYAM CHOWDRY, AGED 36YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O FLAT NO. 5-6, D.NO. 59-8-7, VASUDHA APARTMENTS, GAYATHRINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA.

¶249

MAGANTI ANOOHYA, W/O VALLURU KRISHNA SAROSH, AGED 29 YEARS, OCC. SERVICE, TEMPORARY R/O APT. NC.206, 19, STATION ROAD, NEW BERNET, HERTFORD SHIRE, ENS, IQJ, UNITED KINGDOM, REP BY HER GPA HOLDER MR. MAGANTI ADARSH, S/O SUBRAMANYAM CHOWDRY, R/O FLAT NO. 5-6, D.NO.59-8-7, VASUDHA APARTMENTS, GAYATHRINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA.

¶250

CH VIJAYA RAO, S/O SRI CH. ABBULU, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R1O26-6-230/A, S P BUNGLOW, AKULAVARI THOTA. GUNTUR - 522 004

¶251

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶252

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus, order or any appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 in refusing the registration of sale deed dated 12-6-2019 bearing P No.2733 of 2019 executed by the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the Respondent No.7 by its Refusal OrderNo.25/2019, dated 13-9-2019, and also the action of the Respondent No.2 in confirming the said Refusal Order passed by the Respondent No.3, by dismissing the appeal preferred by the Petitioner under Appeal No.2 of 2019, dated 4-1-2020, as arbitrary and illegal, and for further direction to direct the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 herein to register the sale deed dated 12-6-2019 bearing P No. 2733 of 2019 executed by the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the Respondent No.7, and to release the same without any delay thereafter in the interest of justice, and pass

¶253

IA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶254

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass interim orders suspending the order passed it: - Appeal No.4 of 2019, dated 4-1-2020 passed by the Respondent No.2 herein and also the Refusal Order o.21/2019 dated 13-9-2019, passed by the Respondent No.3 in respect

¶255

20

¶256

CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.Nos.4724, 4737, 4738, 4739, 4741, 4779, 4782,

¶257

4785, 4789, 4791 and 4799 of 2020

¶258

of the sale deed dated 15-06-2019 bearing P No.2863 of 2019, executed and presented by the Petitioner) and the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the Respondent No.7, and consequently !direct the Respondent No.3 to register the sale deed dated 15-6-2019 executed by the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the Respondent No.7, pending disposal of the above said writ petition in the interest of justice, and pass

¶259

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶260

1.D SRINIVAS PRASAD

¶261

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶262

1.GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP)

¶263

2.M R K CHAKRAVARTHY

¶264

WRIT PETITION NO: 4791 OF 2020

¶265

Between:

¶266

MANJEERA CONSTRUCTION LTD.,, A DULY INCORPORATED COMPANY, NO. 711, MANJEERA TRINITY CORPORATE, JNTU, HITECH CITY ROAD, KUKATPALLY, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA, REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI G. YOGANAND, SIO LATE SRI G. CHENNAKESAVULU

¶267

...PETITIONER

¶268

AND

¶269

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR.

¶270

THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, PANTAKALUVA ROAD, MARUTI COLONY, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH.

¶271

THE JOINT SUBREGISTRAR, - 627 RO (0B), OFFICE OF THE SUB REGISTRAR, GANDHI NAGAR, NEAR TALUKA OFFICE, HANUMANPET, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH 520 003.

¶272

21

¶273

CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.Nos.4724, 4737, 4738, 4739, 4741, 4779, 4782,

¶274

4785, 4789, 4791 and 4799 of 2020

¶275

MAGANTI SUBRAHMANYAM CHOWDRY, S/O MAGANTIMALLIKARJUNA RAO, AGED 62 YEARS, OCC. DOCTOR, R/O FLAT NO.5-6, D.NO. 59-8-7, VASUDHA APARTMENT, GAYATRINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA.

¶276

MAGANTI ADARSH, S/O M.SUBRAHMANYAMCHOWDRY, AGED 36YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O FLAT NO. 5-6, D.NO. 59-8-7, VASUDHA APARTMENTS, GAYATHRINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA.

¶277

MAGANTIANOOHYA, W/O VALLURU KRISHNA SAROSH, AGED 29 YEARS, OCC. SERVICE, TEMPORARY R/O APT. NO.206, 19, STATION ROAD, NEW BERNET, HERTFORD SHIRE, EN5, IQJ, UNITED KINGDOM, REP BY HER GPA HOLDER MR. MAGANTI ADARSH, SIO SUBRAMANYAM CHOWDRY, R/O FLAT NO. 5-6, D.NO.59-8-7, VASUDHA APARTMENTS, GAYATHRINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA

¶278

MAMIDIPUDISUBRAHMANYACHAITHANYA, S/O SRI MAINIDIPUDITHEJENDRANATH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, LINGA REDDY STREET, A P GRAMEENA BANK, VAKADU, NELLORE DISTRICT - 524 415

¶279

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶280

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ of mandamus, order or any appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 in refusing the registration of sale deed dated 14-6-2019 bearing P No.2903 of 2019 executed by the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the Respondent No.7 by its 'Refusal Order' No.27/2019, dated 13-9-2019, and also the action of the Respondent No.2 in confirming the said Refusal Order passed by the Respondent No.3, by dismissing the appeal preferred by the Petitioner under Appeal No.6 of 2019, dated 4-1-2020, as arbitrary and illegal, and for further direction to direct the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 herein to register the sale deed dated 14-6-2019 bearing P No. 2903 of 2019 executed by the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the Respondent No.7, and to release the same without any delay thereafter in the interest of justice

¶281

22

¶282

CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.Nos.4724, 4737, 4738, 4739, 4741, 4779, 4782,

¶283

4785, 4789, 4791 and 4799 of 2020

¶284

IA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶285

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass interim orders suspending the order passed in Appeal No.6 of 2019 dated 4-1-2020 passed by the Respondent No.2 herein and also the Refusal Order No.27/2019 dated 13-9-2019, passed by the Respondent No.3 in respect of the sale deed dated 14-06-2019 bearing P No.2903 of 2019, executed and presented by the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the Respondent No.7, and consequently i'direct the Respondent No.3 to register the sale deed dated 14-6-2019 bearing P No.2903/2019 executed by the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the Respondent No.7, pending disposal of the above said writ petition in the interest of justice, and pass

¶286

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶287

1.D SRINIVAS PRASAD

¶288

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶289

1.GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP)

¶290

2.M R K CHAKRAVARTHY

¶291

WRIT PETITION NO: 4799 OF 2020

¶292

Between:

¶293

M CONSTRUCTION LTD, N

¶294

...PETITIONER

¶295

AND

¶296

THE STATE OF AP, M

¶297

...RESPONDENT

¶298

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to

¶299

23

¶300

CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.Nos.4724, 4737, 4738, 4739, 4741, 4779, 4782, 4785, 4789, 4791 and 4799 of 2020

¶301

IA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶302

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass interim orders suspending the order passed in Appeal No.2 of 2019, dated 4-1-2020 passed by the Respondent No.2 herein and also the Refusal Order No.25/2019 dated 13-9-2019, passed by the Respondent No.3 in respect of the sale deed dated 12-06-2019 bearing P No.2733 of 2019, executed and presented by the Petitioner' and the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the Respondent No.7, and consequently ,direct the Respondent No.3 to register the sale deed dated 12-6-2019 bearing P No.2733/2019 executed by the Petitioner and the Respondents 4 to 6 in favour of the Respondent No.7, pending disposal of the above said writ petition

¶303

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶304

1.D SRINIVAS PRASAD

¶305

Counsel for the Respondent:

¶306

1.GP FOR REVENUE (AP)

¶307

24

¶308

CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.Nos.4724, 4737, 4738, 4739, 4741, 4779, 4782,

¶309

4785, 4789, 4791 and 4799 of 2020

¶310

The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)

¶311

This batch of writ petitions are filed by the writ petitioner, challenging the orders of the District Registrar, Vijayawada, dismissing the appeals preferred by the writ petitioner, challenging the orders of the Joint Sub-Registrar, Vijayawada, in refusing to register the sale deeds presented by the writ petitioner relating to sale of the flats of Manjeera Monarch apartment.

¶312

Since all the writ petitions are filed against the orders of the District Registrar, Vijayawada, dismissing the appeals preferred against the orders of the Joint Sub-Registrar, Vijayawada, in refusing to register the sale deeds of the flats, with the consent of all the parties, the writ petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the official respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Mr. M.R.K.Chakravarthy, learned counsel for the unofficial respondent Nos.4 to 6, they are heard together and they are being disposed of by this common order.

¶313

Heard Mr. D.Srinivas Prasad, learned counsel for the writ petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the official respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Mr. M.R.K.Chakravarthy, learned counsel for the unofficial respondent Nos.4 to 6.

¶314

The writ petition No.4785 of 2020 is taken as a lead case in this batch of writ petitions. The unofficial respondent Nos.4 to 6 are the owners of the land in question in an extent of 7.00 acres covered by survey Nos.399 and 399/1 situated at Atmakuru Village of Mangalagiri Mandal of Guntur District. The writ petitioner-Manjeera Construction Limited entered into a development agreement with the land owners, who are the unofficial respondent Nos.4 to 6, for construction of an apartment in the name and style Manjeera Monarch. As per the terms of the said development agreement, a supplementary registered agreement has to be executed between the developer/builder and the land

¶315

25

¶316

CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.Nos.4724, 4737, 4738, 4739, 4741, 4779, 4782, 4785, 4789, 4791 and 4799 of 2020

¶317

owners, determining the share of the apartment that may fall to the share of the builder and the owners of the land. The said supplementary registered agreement was not executed, specifying and determining, as to which flats in the apartment that was constructed fell to the share of the builder and the owners of the land. However, after construction of the apartment, in view of the General Power of Attorney that was executed in favour of the builder by the land owners, he has presented a sale deed executed in favour of respondent Nos.7 and 8 in these writ petitions, in respect of a flat purchased by them, for registration. Initially, the sale deed was presented before the Joint Sub-Registrar of Mangalagiri. He refused to register the sale deed on the ground that the share of the apartment as well as the common area that fell to the shares of the flat owners are not determined. Thereafter, the writ petitioner, who is the builder, has presented the said sale deed before the Joint Sub-Registrar, Vijayawada. He has also refused to register the sale deed on the same ground. Aggrieved by the said refusal to register the sale deeds by the Joint Sub-Registrar, Vijayawada, the writ petitioner has preferred an appeal before the District Registrar, Vijayawada. The District Registrar, Vijayawada, by the impugned order, has confirmed the orders of the Joint Sub-Registrar, Vijayawada, in refusing to register the sale deeds on the ground that the shares of the flats that fell to the share of both the builder and the owners of the land are not specified and the common area that fell to the share of flat owners is also not specified.

¶318

Aggrieved, the writ petitioner has filed these writ petitions, assailing the impugned orders of the District Registrar, Vijayawada, confirming the orders of the Joint Sub-Registrar, Vijayawada, in refusing to register the said sale deeds on the aforesaid grounds.

¶319

We have meticulously gone through the Development Agreement-cumGeneral Power of Attorney that was executed by the unofficial respondent Nos.4 to 6-land owners in favour of the writ petitioner-Manjeera Construction

¶320

26

¶321

CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.Nos.4724, 4737, 4738, 4739, 4741, 4779, 4782,

¶322

4785, 4789, 4791 and 4799 of 2020

¶323

Limited. Clause 2.4 of the said Development Agreement-cum-General Power of Attorney is relevant in the context to consider to resolve the controversy involved in these writ petitions. It reads thus:

¶324

2.4 It is hereby agreed and understood that within 30 days of finalization of Plans by the Developer for the Residential complex (Apartments) separately for each Phase, both the parties shall exchange written communication setting out the details of the allocation of the Apartments falling to their respective shares which shall be reduced into writing in the form of a registered Supplementary Agreement at the expense/cost of the owners for the purpose of dealing with the Apartments falling to their respective shares as their own property and shall be entitled to all income, gains, capital, appreciation and benefits of all kinds accruing or arising from or in relation thereto. However, at the time of sharing, the Parties shall be given due account to the advantages/disadvantages in proportion to their respective shares. It is hereby agreed that the Developer shall construct the Apartments as per the specifications mentioned in Annexure-C .

¶325

Thus, it is evident from the aforesaid clause that within thirty days of finalization of plans by the developer for the residential complex (apartment), separately for each phase, both the parties shall exchange written communication setting out the details of the allocation of the apartments falling to their respective share, which shall be reduced into writing in the form of a registered supplementary agreement at the expense of the owners for the purpose of dealing with the apartments falling to the respective shares as their own property.

¶326

Therefore, as per the terms of the aforesaid development agreement, a supplementary agreement has to be executed between both the parties setting out the details of the allocation of the flats falling to their respective shares and a registered supplementary agreement in writing to that effect has to be executed at the cost of the owners for the purpose of dealing with the flats of the apartment falling to their respective shares. Therefore, after construction of the apartment, they have to allocate the shares of the flats that

¶327

27

¶328

CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.Nos.4724, 4737, 4738, 4739, 4741, 4779, 4782, 4785, 4789, 4791 and 4799 of 2020

¶329

fell to the share of both the developer and the land owners and a registered supplementary agreement has to be executed to that effect. However, the shares of the flats that fell to the shares of both the developer and the land owners are not determined and allocated and no registered supplementary agreement was executed. The same was also not presented before the Joint Sub-Registrar or the Registrar. Therefore, the objection that was taken by the land owners before the Registrar that, as the shares of the flats of the apartment between the developer and the owners of the land are not determined and allocated was rightly entertained by the Registrar and refused to register the sale deeds. We absolutely do not find any legal flaw or infirmity in the impugned orders passed by the District Registrar, Vijayawada, in refusing to register the said deeds. Unless and until the shares of the flats in the apartment are allocated and specified, the developer cannot, taking advantage of the General Power of Attorney that was executed in its favour, sell the flats to the third parties. It may create further legal complication and affect the rights of the third parties, who purchase the flats without allocation of the shares of the flats in the apartment between the builder and the land owners. Therefore, the Joint Sub-Registrar, Vijayawada, has rightly refused to register the sale deeds, as the shares of the flats are not determined and allocated and as the common area that fell to the share of each flat owner is also not specified and determined. The District Registrar, Vijayawada, has also rightly confirmed the orders of the Joint Sub-Registrar, Vijayawada, in refusing to register the sale deeds. Therefore, the impugned orders of the District Registrar, Vijayawada, in confirming the orders of the Joint SubRegistrar, Vijayawada, in refusing to register the sale deeds on the aforesaid grounds are perfectly sustainable under law and they warrant no interference in these writ petitions and they are not liable to be set aside.

¶330

It is significant to note that even as on today also, the writ petitioner/builder did not produce any copy of the registered supplementary

¶331

28

¶332

CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.Nos.4724, 4737, 4738, 4739, 4741, 4779, 4782, 4785, 4789, 4791 and 4799 of 2020

¶333

agreement before the Court to ascertain whether the shares of the flats between the builder and the land owners in the said apartment are determined and allocated and whether the common area that is allotted to each flat owner is specified or not.

¶334

Learned counsel for the writ petitioner would contend that recently after filing of these writ petitions a supplementary agreement was executed between the owners of the land and the builder and it was registered on 23.02.2026. But a copy of the same is also not produced before this Court to examine the same. If any such supplementary agreement was executed and registered, allocating the shares of the flats in the apartment between the builder and the owners of the land and shares are specified then the defect stands cured and it clears the obstacles and impediment for registration of the sale deeds in favour of the purchasers of the flats. Learned counsel for the unofficial respondent Nos.4 to 6 pleaded ignorance of the fact that any such registered supplementary agreement was executed. If any such registered supplementary agreement in terms of clause 2.4 of the Development Agreement-cum-General Power of Attorney dated 24.09.2015 was executed, the writ petitioner or the subsequent developer, who replaced the writ petitioner and entered into its shoes, is at liberty to present the sale deeds that are executed in favour of the third parties-purchasers of the flats before the Sub-Registrar and if it is otherwise in order, the same may be entertained by them and effect registration of the sale deeds. In fact, learned counsel for the unofficial respondent Nos.4 to 6-land owners also conceded that if any such registered supplementary agreement was executed that the subsequent developer, who has taken over the responsibility from the writ petitionerManjeera Construction Limited, as per the resolution plan executed before the NCLT Bench-II, Hyderabad, is at liberty to present the sale deeds for registration.

¶335

29

¶336

CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.Nos.4724, 4737, 4738, 4739, 4741, 4779, 4782, 4785, 4789, 4791 and 4799 of 2020

¶337

Therefore, these writ petitions are dismissed, affirming the impugned orders of the District Registrar, Vijayawada, which are impugned in these writ petitions. However, in view of the subsequent events that took place, as stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner relating to execution of the registered supplementary agreement, they are at liberty to present the sale deeds for registration before the concerned Sub-Registrar. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶338

As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶339

________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

¶340

_____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA

¶341

Date: 26.02.2026 MDP

Manjeera Consiruction Ltd., v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manjeera Consiruction Ltd., v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B.Adi Narayana Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Desu Kasi Viswanatham Vs the Union of India

Satti Venkata Lakshmi, Vs Canara Bank

Gajula Ganesh Vishnu Kumar Vs the State of Ap

Shakthi Imaging and Diagnostic Pvt. Ltd. Vs the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal

Golla Geethamma, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh