Suprabhata Reddy Pamala Vs the Debt Recovery… — Banking and Recovery | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

Suprabhata Reddy Pamala Vs the Debt Recovery… — Banking and Recovery | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Permission to withdraw the writ petition; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions, if any, closed.

Issue for consideration

Whether the pending Securitization proceedings initiated in contravention of the Notifications dated 06-09-2018, 24-02-2020 and 12-02-2021 issued by the Ministry of Finance under the Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act 1993 are illegal, arbitrary, irregular and without jurisdiction (raised in the prayer; not adjudicated as the petition was withdrawn). +1 more

Ratio / Principle

Permission of the Court is granted to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition.

Key takeaways

The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with no order as to costs.ratio¶37
As a sequel to the dismissal, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.ratio¶38

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati (Special Original Jurisdiction) — Writ Petition No. 4559 of 2026, decided 18.06.2026 (Battu Devanand & A. Hari Haranadha Sarma, JJ.; per Battu Devanand, J.). The petitioner, aggrieved by pending Securitization proceedings said to have been initiated in contravention of notifications dated 06-09-2018, 24-02-2020 and 12-02-2021 issued by the Ministry of Finance under the Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act 1993, and by a notice dated 22.11.2025 issued by the Advocate Commissioner pursuant to orders of the Senior Civil Judge cum Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Guntur in Crl.M.P. No. 1034 of 2025 under the SARFAESI Act 2002 directing him to vacate the schedule property within 15 days, approached this Court under Article 226 seeking certiorari in respect of S.A. No. 751 of 2025 on the file of the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Visakhapatnam. Interlocutory applications under Section 151 CPC sought dispensation of certified copies and stay of further proceedings. At hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition; permission was granted and the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn, with no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions, if any, stood closed. No issue on merits was adjudicated.

1

[3545]

APHC010070352026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA

WRIT PETITION NO: 4559/2026

Between:

SUPRABHATA REDDY PAMALA, S/O RAJA GOPAL REDDY AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS RESIDENT OF FLAT NO. 208, DHARANI HOMES 3/10 LINE, VIDYA NAGAR, GUNTUR (A.P) - 522007

...PETITIONER

AND

THE DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, VISAKHAPATNAM, DABAGARDENS - 530002

AUTHORISED OFFICER, M/S AUTHUM INVESTMENT 8C, INFRASTRUETURE LIMITED 707, RAHEJA CENTRE, FREE PRESS JOURNAL ROAD NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI - 400021

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records in S.A No. 751 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent No 1 and quash the pending Securitization proceedings initiated in contravention of the Notifications dated 06-09-2018, 24-02-2020 and 12-02-2021, issued by the Ministry of Finance New Delhi in exercising of the powers conferred under the Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act 1993 by holding the same as illegal, arbitrary, irregular and without jurisdiction and consequently declare the notice dated

2

22.11.2025 issued by the Advocate Commissioner as per the orders passed by the Honhle Senior Civil Judge cum Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Guntur in Crl. M. P. No 1034 of 2025 directing the Petitioner to vacate the Schedule Property within 15 days as invalid, illegal, irregular and deserved to be set asided and pass

IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with the filing of certified copy of the record in S.A. No 751/2025 and allow the petitioner to file Xerox copy of the same and pass

IA NO: 2 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings, including the direction of taking physical possession of the property in pursuance of orders passed by the Hon Hole Senior Civil Judge cum Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Guntur in Crl. M. P. No 1034 of 2025 under provisions of the SARFAESI Act 2002 pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1.RAVI VARALAKSHMI

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

The Court made the following:

3

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

&

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA

WRIT PETITION NO. 4559 of 2026

ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand)

Learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition.

Permission is granted.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

__________________________________ JUSTICE A.HARI HARANADHA SARMA

Dated: 18.06.2026 TM

4

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

&

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA

WRIT PETITION NO: 4559/2026

Dated: 18.06.2026 TM