Dismissed¶38

S.v.Satyanarayana, v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC19 Jul 2026WP/38152/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Andhra Pradesh High Court at Amaravati; W.P. No. 38152 of 2013; Justice Harinath.N; decided 20.07.2026; dismissed as infructuous without adjudication on merits; demolition notice U.C.No.09/2013/BO-VII dated 16-12-2013; Municipal Corporation of Rajahmundry; building D.No.7-28-2 Vygram Road Rajahmundry; Article 226 mandamus; natural justice; no costs; miscellaneous petitions closed.

What did the court decide?

Since the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further consideration on account of subsequent orders passed by the respondent authorities (which the petitioner may challenge separately), this Court held that no adjudication on merits is required in the writ petition. ¶37

S.v.Satyanarayana, Vs The Government of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

Date of reserved for orders :

¶2

Date of pronouncement :

¶3

Date of uploading :

¶4

APHC010312372013

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶6

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶7

[3457]

¶8

MONDAY, THE 20^th DAY OF JULY 2026

¶9

PRESENT

¶10

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

¶11

WRIT PETITION NO: 38152/2013

¶12

Between:

¶13

S.V.SATYANARAYANA,, S/O.APPA RAO, AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC:BUSINESS, R/O.D.NO.7-28-2, VYGRAM ROAD, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

¶14

...PETITIONER

¶15

AND

¶16

THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY , MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT AT HYDERABAD.

¶17

THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF RAJAHMUNDRY, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

¶18

G SURYANARAYANA, S/O.SATYANARAYNA, OCC: BUSINESS PROP:KALINGA BAR & RESTAURANT, VYGRAM ROAD, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

¶19

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶20

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue appropriate writ or order or direction

-2-

HN, J

W.P.No.38152_2013

more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in trying to demolish the portion of building bearing D.No.7-28-2 situated at Vygram Road, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District in pursuance of the notice in U.C.No.09/2013/BO-VII, dt.16-12-2013 wherein the petitioner is running restaurant as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to stop all further proceedings including demolition of the portion of the building bearing D.No.7-28-2 situated at Vygram Road, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District in the interest of justice

¶25

IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 47438 OF 2013

¶26

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay all further proceedings including demolition of portion of the building bearing D.No.7-28-2 situated at Vygram Road, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District in the interest of justice

¶27

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶28

1.K VENKATESH

¶29

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶30

1.VENKAT CHALLA

¶31

2.ANCHA PANDURANGA RAO

¶32

3.GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV

¶33

-3-

¶34

HN, J W.P.No.38152_2013

¶35

ORDER:

¶36

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner(s) submits that the cause in the present writ petition does not survive for any further consideration, as the subsequent orders have been passed by the respondent authorities, which would be challenged by the petitioner(s).

¶37