Dismissed

G.Yugandhar v. The Chairman and Managing Director

Andhra Pradesh HC10 Sept 2026WP/33697/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner challenged electricity assessment proceedings and sought restoration of a disconnected service connection. At the hearing, the petitioner's counsel stated the cause no longer survived and the matter had become infructuous. The court recorded this submission and dismissed the writ petition as infructuous with no order as to costs, closing any pending miscellaneous petitions.

What did the court decide?

None; petition dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions closed

G.Yugandhar Vs The Chairman and Managing… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

APHC010625292016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

FRIDAY, THE 11^th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 33697 OF 2016

¶7

Between:

¶8

G.Yugandhar, S/o G.RAma Naidu (Late) Aged about: Yrs, Occ: Cultivation R/o Yachavaram Village and Post, Balayapalli Mandal of S.P.S.R.Nellore District

¶9

...Petitioner

¶10

AND

¶11

The Chairman and Managing Director, A.P.S.P.D.C.L., Vidyuth Nilayam Raghavendra Nagar, Kesavayanagunta, Tirupati

¶12

The Chief General Manager Operation, A.P.S.P.D.C.L., Vidyuth Nilayam

¶13

The Superintending Engineer Operation, A.P.S.P.D.C.L, Near Raja Rajeswari Temple Venkatagiri, S.P.S.R. Nellore District

¶14

The Asst Divisional Engineer Operation, A.P.S.P.D.C.L., Near Palakendram Venkatagiri, S.P.S.R. Nerllore District

¶15

...Respondents

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toappropriate writ, order or direction more particularly a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in issuing proceedings in Cr.No. ADE/OPIV/ V.GIRI/SUB-PE/D.No.119/16, dt.19.02.2016 as illegal,

¶17

¶18

arbitrary violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, a part from non compliance of the principles of natural justice and for a consequential direction or order setting aside the aforesaid Assessment proceedings dt.19.02.2016

¶19

IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 41593 OF 2016

¶20

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to restore the electricity service connection bearing No.3621148000005, category (LTI (A)-Domestic 3621148 Yacharam Village (N148) Village/Section in Balayapalli Mandal of S.P.S.R. Nellore District, pertaining to the petitioner

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner: P HEMACHANDRA

¶22

Counsel for the Respondents: Venkata Rama Rao Kota SC FOR APSPDCL Counsel for the Respondents:V R REDDY KOVVURI(SC FOR APSPDCL) Counsel for the Respondents: Counsel for the Respondents:JAGARLAMUDI KOTESWARI DEVI

¶23

The Court made the following order:

¶24

¶25

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA

¶26

WRIT PETITION NO: 33697 OF 2016

¶27

ORDER:

¶28

Heard Sri Manikanta, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents.

¶29

When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Manikanta, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the present writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and the matter becomes infructuous.

¶30

Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶31

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

¶32

__________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J

11.09.2026 BSP

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA

¶37

WRIT PETITION NO: 33697 OF 2016

¶38

11.09.2026 BSP

G.Yugandhar v. The Chairman and Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Yugandhar v. The Chairman and Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases