Dismissed¶30

Dantuluri Rama Chandra Gopala Raju, v. The state of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC15 Jun 2026WP/29615/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

AP High Court Amaravati; WRIT PETITION No. 29615/2025; Justice Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao; dismissed as infructuous; diet contractor treated as criminal/accused/convicted; Rc. No. 452/E-SEC/DCHS-VSP/2025 dt. 26-08-2025; CC 1026/2023; Crime No. 156/2016; Narsipatnam Police Station; Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division); Devi Enterprises; tender rejection; Writ of Mandamus; Article 226; Articles 14, 19, 20; Section 151 CPC interim application; IA No. 1 of 2025; Vinodin Ruth Madapalli; GP for Med Health and Family Welfare; no costs; miscellaneous petitions closed.

What the court decided

AI extract

Dantuluri Rama Chandra Gopala Raju, Vs The… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

[3330]

¶2

APHC010574852025

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

TUESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 29615/2025

¶7

Between:

¶8

DANTULURI RAMA CHANDRA GOPALA RAJU,, S/O LATE APPALA NARASIMHA RAJU, AGED 48 YEARS, DIET CONTRACTOR, R/O D.NO. 15-11-6/4, PREMIER RESIDENCY, KRISHNA NAGAR, MAHARANIPET, VISAKAPATNAM

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HEALTH, MEDICAL AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI,GUNTUR DISTRICT.

¶12

THE DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY HEALTH, TADEPALLI GUNTUR.

¶13

THE COMMISSIONER MEDICAL HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, 5TH FLOOR, APIIC TOWERS NEAR AUTO NAGAR, ROAD NO 2 MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH - 522503

¶14

THE DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, O/O DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION NEAR OLD GOVERNMENT GENERAL HOSPITAL, HANUMANPET-520003

¶15

THE DISTRICT COORDINATOR OF HOSPITAL SERVIES, VISAKAPATNAM

¶16

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶17

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ or direction, especially on in nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents particularly 5th respondent proceedings vide Rc. No. 452/E-SEC/DCHS- VSP/2025. Dt. 26-08-2025 and treating the petitioner Diet Contractor as a criminal/accused /convicted without finalizing the CC 1026/2023 in Crime No. 156/2016 of on the file of Narsipatnam Police Station, Visakapatnam, Visakapatnam District, is illegal, arbitrary,violative principles of Natural Justice, Violation of Articles 14, 19, 20 of the constitution of India. And consequently, direct the respondents 2 and 4 authorities herein not to declare me as criminal/ accused / convicted and not to reject the petitioner tenders filed in the name of Dantuluri Rama Chandra Gopala Raju as a

¶18

¶19

proprietor / by the firm name Devi Enterprises as a partner / by any other firm on this ground until the finalizing of the CC 1026/2023 in the file of Additional civil Judge (Junior Division) in Crime No. 156/2016 of on the file of Narsipatnam Police Station, Visakapatnam, Visakapatnam District IA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶20

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased please to direct the respondent authorities to accept Petitioner tenders filed in the name of Dantuluri Rama Chandra Gopala Raju as a proprietor / by the firm name Devi Enterprises as a partner / by any other firm for supply of diet, and to follow due process of law. Till the disposal of the crime registered on me Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶21

1.VINODIN RUTH MADAPALLI

¶22

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶23

1.GP FOR MED HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE

¶24

The Court made the following:

¶25

¶26

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.29615 of 2025

¶27

ORDER:

¶28

Learned counsel for the petitioner represented and stated that the writ petition has rendered infructuous. Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle.

¶29

Recording the said submission, the present Writ Petition is

¶30

dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶31

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶32

__________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

¶33

Date: 16.06.2026

¶34

KBN