Dismissed

N.S.Swarna, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC17 Sept 2026WP/28823/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A Senior Assistant in the Registration and Stamps Department challenged her deputation order dated 13.10.2025 as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Fundamental Rule 110 and natural justice. The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to set aside the order and interim relief to stay its operation. At the final hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition, which the court granted, dismissing the petition as withdrawn with no order as to costs and disposing of related interim applications.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; no order as to costs; interim applications disposed of.

N.S.Swarna, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh — Service and Employment | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading :

¶2

APHC010559222025

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3460] (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 18^th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 28823/2025

¶8

Between:

¶9

N.S.SWARNA,, D/O. RAVINDRANATH TAGORE AGED 48 YEARS, WORKING AS SENIOR ASSISTANT, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, REGISTRATION AND STAMPS DEPARTMENT, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY REGISTRATION AND STAMPS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT

¶13

THE COMMISSIONER AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION AND STAMPS, ANDHRA PRADESH, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT

¶14

THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION AND STAMPS, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT.

¶15

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶16

¶17

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ or Order more in the nature of Mandamus in declaring the action of the 3 rd respondent in issuing deputation proceedings vide in No.El/402/2025, dated 13.10.2025 deputing the petitioner from Rahahmahendravaram to 2nd respondent office, as illegal,arbitrary middle of academic year, in violation of FR 110 ,vilation of principles of natural justice, and accordingly set aide the 3rd respondent in issuing deputation proceedings vide in No.El/402/2025, dated 13.10.2025

¶18

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶19

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to continue the petitioner in the post of Senior Assistant Office at the District Registrar, Registration and Stamps Department, Rajamahendravaram East Godavari District by suspending the operation of the deputation proceedings issued by the 3rd respondent in No.E1/402/2025, dated : 13.10.2025

¶20

IA NO: 2 OF 2025

¶21

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim order dated 17.10.2025 in W.P.No.28823 of 2025 and dismiss the Writ Petition and pass

¶22

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶23

1.K R SRINIVAS

¶24

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶25

1.GP FOR SERVICES I

¶26

The Court made the following:

¶27

¶28

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

¶29

W.P.No.28823 of 2025

¶30

O R DE R:

¶31

Learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of this

¶32

Court to withdraw the writ petition

¶33

Permission as sought for is accorded.

¶34

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.

¶35

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions if any shall stand dismissed.

¶36

___________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J

¶37

Date: 18.09.2026

¶38

KLP

N.S.Swarna, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N.S.Swarna, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases