Dismissed

Ivaturi Jayaram v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC15 Sept 2026WP/28091/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for protection and dismissal of complaints was dismissed by the single-judge bench of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh for non-prosecution due to lack of appearance.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition No: 28091/2023 and IA No: 1 of 2023 were dismissed for non-prosecution; pending miscellaneous petitions stood closed.

Ivaturi Jayaram Vs The State of Andhra… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

APHC010538612023

¶2

[3604]

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

WEDNESDAY, THE 16^th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM WRIT PETITION NO: 28091/2023

¶8

Between:

¶9

IVATURI JAYARAM, S/O. VEERESWARA, RESIDENT OF D.NO.9332/22, 4TH LANE, RAJENDRANAGAR, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT - 521301

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT OFFICE, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. PIN. 522 503

¶13

THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT, T.T.D. KALYANA MANDAPAM ROAD, VIJAYAWADA PIN. 520002

¶14

THE SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. PIN. 521301.

¶15

THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, I TOWN POLICE STATION, SATYANNARAYANAPURAM, GUDIVADA- 521301.

¶16

POLISETTY MOHANA RAO, S/O GOVARDHANAM, D.NO.9/297, PLOT NO. 201, MARUTI KONDAPALLI TOWER, GOWRISHANAKARA PURAM, GUDIVADA KRISHNA DISTRICT- 521301

¶17

PONNAGANTI BABY SAROJINI LAKSHMI, W/O KRISHNA, DOOR NO.2-17, PEDDAPALAPARRU, MUDINEPALLI VILLAGE, MOTURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT- 521323. PONNAGANTI NARENDRA S/O KRISHNA, DOOR NO.2-17, PEDDAPALAPARRU, MUDINEPALLI

¶18

¶19

VILLAGE, MOTURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT- 521323.

¶20

PONNAGANTI NARENDRA, S/O KRISHNA, DOOR NO.2-17, PEDDAPALAPARRU, MUDINEPALLI VILLAGE, MOTURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT- 521323.

¶21

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶22

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS directing the Respondents 2 to 4 to give protection to the life, business and personal liberty of the petitioner from the clutches of the respondents 5 to 7 under Articles 19 (1) (g), 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also to direct the respondents 2 to 4 to dispose the representation given by the petitioner on 16-10-2023 and to pass such

¶23

IA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶24

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to give directions to the Respondents 2 to 4 to conduct deep root investigation if any complaints given by the respondents 5 to 7 within the Jurisdiction of the Respondents 2 to 4 and to pass such

¶25

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶26

1.SIVANANDA VADAPALLI

¶27

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶28

1.B S N NAIDU

¶29

2.GP FOR HOME

¶30

The Court made the following:

¶31

¶32

THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM

¶33

WRIT PETITION No: 28091 OF 2023

¶34

ORDER:

¶35

No representation on behalf of the petitioner.

¶36

On the last two adjournments also i.e. on 19.06.2026 and 08.09.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner has no interest to prosecute the case.

¶37

In the result , this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶38

As a sequel thereto, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

¶39

________________________

¶40

SUNITHA GANDHAM, J 16.09.2026

¶41

Vns

Ivaturi Jayaram v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ivaturi Jayaram v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases