Dismissed¶33

Kota Priyanka v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC6 Jan 2026WP/26233/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition dismissed as infructuous - no cause survives - Article 226 mandamus - non-disposal of representation dated 26.05.2020 by Sub Registrar, Gajuvaka, Visakhapatnam - release of document pending registration No. P235/2011 - Section 151 CPC interlocutory applications closed - interim order deemed vacated - no costs - Justice B. Krishna Mohan - High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati - decided 07.01.2026 - W.P.No.26233 of 2022.

What did the court decide?

None to the petitioners; writ petition dismissed as infructuous on counsel's submission that no cause survives; interim order, if any, deemed vacated; no order as to costs; pending interlocutory applications closed. ¶33

Kota Priyanka Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

APHC010427512022

¶2

[3233]

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 26233/2022

¶8

Between:

¶9

KOTA PRIYANKA, W/O. SANGAMESHWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, RIO. H. NO. 16-2-740/17, KALYAN NAGAR, GADDIANNARAM, HYDERABAD, TELA NGANA

¶10

KRISHNA VENI,, W/O. J. RAMAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, RIO. FLAT NO. 101, A-57, R.K. ARCADE, MADHURA NAGAR, AMEERPET, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA.

¶11

...PETITIONER(S)

¶12

AND

¶13

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VALGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNUTUR DISTRICT.

¶14

THE DISTRICT SUB REGISTRAR, OF ASSURANCE REGISTRATION AND STAMPS, VISKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

¶15

THE SUB REGISTRAR, GAJUVAKA VILLAGE AND MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

¶16

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶17

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 in not disposing the represenatation dated 26.05.2020 as arbitraray illegal and violative of Principles of NaturalJustice consequently direct the respondents to

¶18

¶19

HBKM,J W.P.No.26233 of 2022

¶20

consider and pa appropriate orders on the petitioner represenatation dated 26.05.2020 forthwith, take steps to release the document which is pending regsitration no. P235/2011 and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts of the case. and to pass

¶21

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶22

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondent No. 3 to release the document which is pending registration no.P233120 Upending disposal of the writ petition and pass

¶23

IA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶24

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant leave to the petitioners herein/Respondents No.3 in the WP.No.26233 of 2022 to file the counter affidavit in the above writ petition and pass

¶25

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶26

1.RAMALAKSHMANA REDDY SANEPALLI

¶27

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶28

1..

¶29

¶30

HBKM,J W.P.No.26233 of 2022

¶31

The Court made the following Order:

¶32

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no cause survives in this writ petition.

¶33

Recording the said submission, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶34

As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶35

__________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN

¶36

07.01.2026 PGT

Kota Priyanka v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kota Priyanka v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Uma Maheswara Reddy Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Mullu Kodi Naidu, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Turaka Lakshmamma Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Bhavya Constructions Private Limited Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

K R Eswaramma Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Kannegani Siddartha Vs the State of Ap