Dismissed

Kesagalla Nandini v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC17 Sept 2026WP/23503/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner, an employee of the A.P. State Ware Housing Corporation, sought a writ of mandamus to compel promotion from Warehouse Manager Grade-III to Grade-II. Before the court could rule on the merits, the petitioner's counsel filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition due to changed circumstances. The court granted permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn, with no order as to costs.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn; no order as to costs.

Kesagalla Nandini Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh — Service and Employment | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

APHC010431522024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 18^th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI WRIT PETITION NO: 23503 OF 2024

¶7

Between:

¶8

KESAGALLA NANDINI, D/o Late K.Sriramulu, aged about 37 years, R/o D.N0.46-1-VBD, Vasavi Gardens, Johrapuram Road, Kurnool, Kurnool District.

¶9

...Petitioner

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Agriculture Cooperation department. Secretariat buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. 2. The A P State Ware Housing Corporation, Auto nagar, Vijayawada. Rep. by its Vice Chairman and Managing Director.

¶12

The General Manager M and QC, A.P.State Ware Housing Corporation, Vijayawada, NTR District.

¶13

...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue WRIT OF MANDAMUS or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to DECLARE the action of the respondent officials in not considering the petitioners candidature for promotion from Warehouse Manager Grade-Ill to Warehouse Manager Grade-ll in the respondent corporation inspite of possessing requisite qualifications, as illegal, arbitrary, without authority, null and void, violation of principles of natural justice as also contrary to Articles 14, 15 and 19(1)(g) of Constitution of India and consequently COMMAND the respondent

¶14

¶15

officials to promote the petitioner to Warehouse Manager Grade-ll from Warehouse Manager Grade-Ill in the respondent corporation in the interest of justice and to pass such

¶16

IA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶17

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to DIRECT the respondent officials to consider my candidature for promotion from Warehouse Manager Grade-Ill to Warehouse Manager Grade-ll in the respondent corporation in the interest of justice pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass such

¶18

IA NO: 1 OF 2026

¶19

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant leave to file the Counter affidavit in WP.No.23503 of 2024 and to pass

¶20

Counsel for the Petitioner: P.VENKATA NARASIMHULU Counsel for the Respondents: A RAJENDRA BABU Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following order:

¶21

¶22

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI

¶23

WRIT PETITION NO: 23503 of 2024

¶24

O R D E R

¶25

Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner has filed a Memo dated 10.09.2026, seeking permission to withdraw the present Writ Petition in view of the change in circumstances subsequent to the filing

¶26

of the Writ Petition.

¶27

1. Permission granted.

¶28

1. Accordingly, the Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶29

1. No order as to costs.

¶30

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall

¶31

stand closed.

¶32

__________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI

¶33

Date: 18.09.2026 SM

¶34

¶35

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI

¶36

WRIT PETITION No. 23503 of 2024

¶37

Dated: 18.09.2026

¶38

Kesagalla Nandini v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kesagalla Nandini v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases