Dismissed¶37

A Saraswathi v. the State of Ap

Andhra Pradesh HC26 Apr 2026WP/2341/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

APHC W.P. No. 2341/2019, A. Saraswathi v. State of AP, Joint Collector Prakasam, RDO Markapur, Tahsildar Markapur & Bondili Charan Singh and others — revenue records dispute, ROR-1B/Pattadar Pass Book/Title Deed, Ac.0.50 cents in Sy.No. 892/1A1, Markapuram Town and Mandal, Prakasam District; impugned Joint Collector order D.Dis.D2/ROR/REV/3/2016 dt. 16-01-2019 against RDO order D.Dis.A/321/2016 dt. 07-06-2018; Articles 226, 14, 19, 21; Section 151 CPC; Sumathi Jagadam, J.; dismissed as infructuous on 27.04.2026, no costs, interim orders vacated, no adjudication on merits.

What did the court decide?

On the submission of counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Court held that the matter has become infructuous. ¶36

A Saraswathi Vs the State of Ap — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

APHC010050272019

¶2

[3459]

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO: 2341/2019

¶9

Between:

¶10

A SARASWATHI, W/O. NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. DOOR NO.10-90/6, MARKAPURAM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

¶14

THE JOINT COLLECTOR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE.

¶15

THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

¶16

THE TAHSILDAR, MARKAPUR MANDAL, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

¶17

BONDILI CHARAN SINGH, S/O.LATE KASIRAM SINGH, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. DOOR NO.6/217, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

¶18

BONDILI VIJAY KUMAR SINGH, S/O.LATE KASIRAM SINGH, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O.DOOR NO.6/297, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

¶19

BONDILI MURALI BHAI, W/O.POORNA SINGH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, RJO.NEAR SIPHANI FACTORY, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

¶20

¶21

BONDILI KOSALYA BAI, W/O.BHAVANI SINGH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O.NEAR MUNICIPAL WATER TANK, WARD, TARLUPUADU ROAD, MARKAPURAM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT

¶22

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶23

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order in D.Dis.D2/ROR/REV/3/2016, dated 16-01-2019 passed by the respondent No.2 against the order in D.Dis.A/321/2016, dated 07-06-2018 passed by the respondent No.3 wherein cancelling the entry in the ROR-1B and Pattadar Pass Book and Title Deed for the land in an extent of Ac.0.50 Cents in Sy.No. 892/1A1 of Markapuram Town and Mandal, Prakasam District which was issued in my name as arbitrary, illegal and violate the fundamental rights guaranteed to me under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same and direct the respondents No.2 and 3 to restore the ROR/1B entries as well as Pattadar Pass Book and Title Deed on my name for the land in an extent of Ac.0.50 Cents in Sy.No. 892/1A1 of Markapuram Town and Mandal, Prakasam District

¶24

IA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶25

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To suspend the order in D.Dis.D2/ROR/REV/3/2016, dated 16-01-2019 passed by the respondent No.2 against the order in D.Dis.A/321/2016, dated 07-06-2018 passed by the respondent No.3 pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass

¶26

IA NO: 2 OF 2019

¶27

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim order Dt: 25-02-2019 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in W.P.No. 2341 / 2019 by this Hon'ble Court in the interests of justice and pass

¶28

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶29

¶30

1.P V N KIRAN KUMAR

¶31

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶32

1.GP FOR REVENUE (AP)

¶33

2.M CHALAPATI RAO

¶34

¶35

The Court made the following ORDER:

¶36

Sri B.Siva Rama Krishna, learned counsel, representing learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the matter has becomes infructuous.

¶37

In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.

¶38

Interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated.

¶39

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶40

__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

¶41

Date: 27.04.2026 rsd

¶42

¶43