Disposed

Challa Sanjeev Kumar, v. State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC10 Sept 2026WP/23119/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking release of the second instalment of financial assistance under a government education scheme. The High Court disposed of the writ petition directing the respondents to examine the petitioner's claim within six weeks and, if found in order, release the amount due within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to examine the petitioner's claim within six weeks and, if found in order, release the amount due within a further period of eight weeks.

Challa Sanjeev Kumar, Vs State of Andhra… — Education and Admissions | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

HN, J

W.P.No.23119_2026

APHC010425612026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

¶6

AT AMARAVATI

¶7

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶8

[3457]

¶9

FRIDAY, THE 11^th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

¶10

PRESENT

¶11

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

¶12

WRIT PETITION NO: 23119/2026

¶13

Between:

¶14

CHALLA SANJEEV KUMAR,, S/O. VENKATESWARA RAO, STUDENT, R/O. FLAT NO. 307, SAL TEJA APARTMENT, SRINIVASARAO PET, 9TH LANE, GUNTUR TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522004.

¶15

...PETITIONER

¶16

AND

¶17

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY B.C. WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

¶18

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

¶19

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, B.C. WELFARE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, 2ND FLOOR, VISHAL RESIDENCY, TADIGADAPA VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

¶20

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶21

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue an order, writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not releasing second instalment of financial assistance of Rs.5,00,000/-to the petitioner under Application ID No. OV2018115955 despite sanction of funds by the Government as per G.O.Rt. No.174 dated 07.12.2017 r/w. G.O.Ms. No.29

HN, J

W.P.No.23119_2026

dated 27.08.2016 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to release second installment of financial assistance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- to the petitioner forthwith

¶26

IA NO: 1 OF 2026

¶27

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents to release second installment of financial assistance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- to the petitioner under Application ID No. OV2018115955 forthwith, pending disposal of the writ petition

¶28

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶29

1.RAMESH BABU TALLURI

¶30

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶31

1.GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE

¶32

2.GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING

HN, J

ORDER:

The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents in not releasing financial assistance of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs only), sanctioned to the Petitioner (Application I.D No.OV2018115955) under the ‘Videshi Vidya Deevana’ Scheme, as illegal and arbitrary.

¶37

The petitioner had applied for financial assistance under the ‘Videshi Vidya Deevana’ Scheme, as per G.O.Rt.No.174 dated 07.12.2017, r/w. G.O.Ms. No.29 dated 27.08.2016, and the same was allotted with Application I.D.No.OV2018115955. Respondent No.3 issued proceedings vide sanction order Rc.No.B1/1840/2018-58, dated 14.10.2018, stating that he is eligible under the Scheme for an amount of Rs.10,00,000/-. The 1^st installment of Rs.5,00,000/- was released to him, but the 2^nd installment of Rs.5,00,000/was not released for pursuing graduation at Washington University of Health Sciences, USA, for the course of Masters’ Degree, even after the result of the 1^st semester was uploaded. The financial assistance promised to the petitioner was not disbursed to him. Hence, the present writ petition is filed.

¶38

Learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondents submits that the application of the petitioner would be considered and amount due would be sanctioned, if the petitioner is within the conditions specified for release of the due amount.

¶39

¶40

HN, J

¶41

W.P.No.23119_2026

¶42

Considering the submissions, this writ petition is disposed off, with the following directions:

¶43

(i) The respondents are directed to examine the claim of the petitioner within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶44

(ii) In the event, the claim of the petitioner is found to be in order, the respondents are directed to release the amount due to the petitioner within a further period of eight (08) weeks. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶45

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

¶46

___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N

¶47

Date:11.09.2026 NKA

¶48

Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No

HN, J

181

W.P.No.23119_2026

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

¶54

WRIT PETITION NO: 23119 of 2026

¶55

Date: 11.09.2026

¶56

NKA

Challa Sanjeev Kumar, v. State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Challa Sanjeev Kumar, v. State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases