Dismissed

M/S Ushodaya Lorry Transport v. Union of India

Andhra Pradesh HC15 Sept 2026WP/20268/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition no longer survived and the matter had become infructuous. The court recorded this submission and dismissed the writ petition as infructuous with no order as to costs, closing all pending applications.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs; all pending applications closed.

M/S Ushodaya Lorry Transport Vs Union of India — GST and Indirect Tax | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

APHC010397672025

[3543]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

WEDNESDAY, THE 16^th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

¶8

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR

¶9

WRIT PETITION No: 20268 of 2025

¶10

Between:

¶11

M/S USHODAYA L O RRY TRANSPORT, HAVING ITS R E GISTERED OFFICE AT D.No. 5 4 -2-4B, 4TH CROSS, 3^RD ROAD, AUTO NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, KRIS H NA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADES H - 520007. REPRESENTED B Y ITS MANAGING PARTNER, PONAMALA VENKATA RAMA RA J U.

¶12

...PETITIONER

¶13

AND

¶14

UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH SECRETARY, MINI S TRY OF FINANCE, DEPART M ENT OF REVENUE JEEVAN DEEP B UILDING, SANSAD MARG, NE W DELHI-110001.

¶15

DIRECTORATE G E NERAL OF GST INTELLIGENC E DGGI, THROUGH DIRECT O R GENERAL 1ST AND 2ND FLO O R, WING NUMBER 06, WES T BLOCK, 08 RK PURAM, NEW DELHI, DELHI 110066 PRDG.DGGI H [email protected].

¶16

DIRECTORATE G ENERAL OF GST INTELLIGENCE, VISHAKAPATNAM Z O NAL UNIT REPRESENTED BY IT S DEPUTY DIRECTOR, D.N O .28-14-17, SURYABAGH, BESIDE MELODY THEATRE, VISHAK A PATNAM - 530020 [email protected].

¶17

THE ADDITIONAL ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, DIRE C TORATE GENERAL OF GST INTELLIGENCE (DGGI), VISAKH A PATNAM ZONAL UNIT, DOOR NO. 28-14-17, SURYA BAGH, BESIDE MELODY THEATRE, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530020.

¶18

THE DEPUTY / ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, VIJAYAW A DA COST DIVISION, D.NO. 5 5 -17-3, C-14 AND PC-1, 3RD FLO O R, NEAR CGO COMPLEX, R O AD NO.2, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, AUT O NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA - 5200 0 7.

¶19

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶20

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶22

Ms.JYOTHI RATNA ANUMOLU

¶23

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶24

1.Smt.SANTHI CHANDRA

¶25

2.SANTHI CHANDRA(Sr.STANDING COUNSEL FOR DRI AND DGGI)

¶26

¶27

The Court made the following order: (Per NJS, J)

¶28

It is represented by Mr.P.Lalith Ram, learned counsel representing the counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive and the matter has become infructuous.

¶29

Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶30

Consequently, all pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.

¶31

__________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

¶32

_____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR

¶33

Date: 16.09.2026 BLV

¶34

¶35

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

¶36

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR

W.P.No.20268 of 2025

Dt: 16.09.2026

BLV

M/S Ushodaya Lorry Transport v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Ushodaya Lorry Transport v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases