Petitioner counsel submitted the writ petition had become infructuous. The court accepted this submission and dismissed the petition as infructuous, closing associated miscellaneous petitions.
No orders as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APHC010376892026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 20175 OF 2026
Between:
...Petitioner
AND
2
...Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioner: SATYANARAYANA NIMMALA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ENERGY
Counsel for the Respondents: V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) Counsel for the Respondents: P M MITHILESHWARA REDDY
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 20175 OF 2026
The Court made the following order:
Learned counsel for the Writ Petitioner submits that the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Hence, no further orders required in this case.
________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J
Dated: 10.09.2026 Mnr
4
155
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION No.20175 OF 2026
Dt: 10.09.2026
Mnr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is infructuous and if so, what is the appropriate order?
M AND G GROUP
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, APCPDCL
THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, OPERATION CIRCLE, APCPDCL
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, OPERATION DIVISION, APCPDCL
THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, OPERATION, APCPDCL
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
