Writ petition challenging revenue authorities' attempt to interfere with petitioners' land possession was disposed of by directing authorities not to interfere without due process of law.
Respondents directed not to interfere with petitioner's possession of the specified land without following due process of law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3331]
APHC010371162026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 19943/2026
Between:
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
Page 2 of 4
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order, or Direction, particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of Respondents No. 4 and 5 in trying to interfere with petitioners possession and enjoyment over the land to an extent of Ac.3.00 cents in Sy. No. 7-1P39 of Komatikunta Rajupalem Village, Sydapuram Mandal, SPSR Nellore District belongs to the 1st petitioner, and the land to an extent of Ac.3.00 cents in Sy. No. 7-1P29 of Komatikunta Rajupalem Village, Sydapuram Mandal, SPSR Nellore District belonging to the 2nd petitioner, under the guise of the notices dated 22.06.2026 and 14.07.2026 based on the representation of the 6th Respondent herein as illegal, high-handed, arbitrary, ultra vires, against the principles of natural justice, and contrary to law, apart from being in blatant violation of Article 300A of the Constitution of India and consequentially direct the respondents not to interfere with petitioners possession and enjoyment over the land to an extent of Ac. 3.00 cents in Sy. No. 7-1P39 of Komatikunta Rajupalem Village, Sydapuram Mandal, SPSR Nellore District belongs to 1st petitioner, and the land to an extent of Ac.3.00 cents in Sy. No. 7-1P29 of Komatikunta Rajupalem Village, Sydapuram Mandal, SPSR Nellore District belonging to the 2nd petitioner in the interest of justice and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to DIRECT the respondents not to interfere with petitioners’ possession and enjoyment over the land to an extent of Ac. 3.00 cents in Sy. No. 7-1P39 of Komatikunta Rajupalem Village, Sydapuram Mandal, SPSR Nellore District belongs to 1®* petitioner, and the land to an extent of Ac.3.00 cents in Sy. No. 7-1P29 of Komatikunta Rajupalem Village, Sydapuram Mandal, SPSR Nellore District belonging to the 2nd petitioner pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
Page 3 of 4
2.KALUVA YAMINI NIKITHA
The Court made the following:
ORDER
Heard Sri Kambhampati Ramesh Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Divya Teja, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, for the respondents.
Page 4 of 4
authorities not to interfere with an extent of Ac.3.00 cents each in S.Nos.71P39 and 7-1P29 respectively of Komatikunta Rajupalem village, Sydapuram Mandal, SPRS Nellore District, without following due process of law. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
PVD
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents can interfere with the petitioners' possession of the disputed land.
RAGIPATI KRISHNAIAH
MANGANAPURI RAVANAMMA
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NELLORE
RAGIPATI HARI BABU
SUBBA REDDY SATTI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
