The High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati, in a writ petition regarding land acquisition compensation and possession, permitted withdrawal. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn with no costs awarded, and pending miscellaneous petitions were closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3331]
APHC010335352026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 19342/2026
Between:
...PETITIONER(S)
Page 2 of 3
DISTRICT-531001.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to action of the Respondent No. 3 (The Tahsildar) to immediately implement the orders passed in W.P. No. 15529 of 2022 in their entirety by completing the mutation and registration for the remaining extent of Ac. 2.51 Cents in Sy.No. 16-2B of Ravipalem Village and issue the Title Deed-cum-ePassbook in favor of the Petitioners. To the Respondents No. 4 (Special Deputy Collector, LA), Respondent No. 5 (VC and MD, APIIC), and Respondent No. 6 (Zonal Manager, APIIC) to immediately determine, sanction, and disburse the full land acquisition compensation amount along
Page 3 of 3
with all statutory benefits, solatium, and interest to the petitioners for the total extent of Ac. 5.00 Cents in Sy.No. 16-2B of Ravipalem Village, which has been utilized/alienated for industrial purposes, without any further delay and Pass such
IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Direct Respondents No. 7 to 11, their men, and agents from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the scheduled property by the Petitioners and Pass such
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.M S S SWAYAM PRAKASH BABU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION
The Court made the following:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Learned counsel also filed a letter before the Registrar (Judicial) requesting to list the above writ petition under the caption “For Dismissal”.
Permission, as sought for, is accorded.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is Dismissed as Withdrawn. No costs.
As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous petitions, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
PVD
SMT. BANDARU KANTHA
SMT. KARRI RAMANAMMA
KARRI SRINIVASARAO
KARRI SHEKAR
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER RDO
SUBBA REDDY SATTI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
