C v. Subba Reddy v Tirupati Urban Development Authority Rep by its
Case brief
What is this about?
Dismissal for non-prosecution; writ of mandamus; Article 226 Constitution of India; Section 151 CPC; WPMP 23142 of 2014 / IA No. 1 of 2014; Tirupati Urban Development Authority (TUDA); Sub-Registrar Renigunta; Tahsildar Tirupati Urban Mandal; title defect rectification; MIG Plot No. 380 and MIG Plot No. 381; Sy.No. 189/4 and 191/8; 266.66 sq.yds; Seshachalam Hill View Extent Layout; Chennaigunta Village; private respondents from Karnataka State; no representation by petitioner on 07.04.2026 and 10.04.2026; listed under caption 'For dismissal'; no order as to costs; interlocutory applications closed; single judge bench of Justice Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad; AP High Court Amaravati; no merits adjudicated.
What did the court decide?
Since there was no representation on behalf of the writ petitioner on 07.04.2026 and again on 10.04.2026, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution, with no order as to costs.