Dismissed

G Varalakshmi v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC14 Sept 2026WP/1795/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one, dismissing the petition accordingly and closing pending miscellaneous applications in connection with the matter.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition was granted. Pending miscellaneous applications were closed.

G Varalakshmi Vs the State of Andhra… — Municipal and Town Planning | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

[3458]

¶2

APHC010025772026

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 15^th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 1795 OF 2026

¶8

Between:

¶9

G VARALAKSHMI, W/O. G. SUBRAMANYAM, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/O. 8-65/B1, ROYAL NAGAR, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI (URBAN) MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 517501

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT A.P.SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522238

¶13

THE DIRECTOR OF TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING, DIRECTORATE OF TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING, GROUND FLOOR, MGM CAPITAL, BEHIND DR. NTR VAIDYASEVA TRUST, MANGALAGIRI, ANDHRA PRADESH-522503

¶14

TIRUPATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER, TIRUPATI, ANDHRA PRADESH-517501

¶15

BHAGAVATHULA PADMA KUMAR SET EXPARTE, S/O. BHAGAVATHULA LAKSHMI NARAYANA, R/O. 494, IRALA NAGAR, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI (URBAN) MANDAL TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-517507

¶16

YARRA NARASA REDDY SET EXPARTE, R/O. PLOT NO. 33 AND 34, POSTAL COLONY, RENIGUNTA ROAD, TIRUPATI TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-517501

¶17

RR 4 AND 5 ARE SET EX PARTE AS PER C.O.DT.24.04.2026

¶18

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶19

¶20

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶21

1.KANDERI CHETHAN

¶22

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶23

1.POTHAM VENGALA REDDY SC For M.Corporation in Rayalaseema region In

¶24

2.GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP

¶25

The Court made the following order:

¶26

Sri Kanderi Chethan, Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to file a fresh writ petition.

¶27

Permission is accorded.

¶28

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to file a fresh writ petition. No costs.

¶29

As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed.

¶30

______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

Date: 15.09.2026 BSK

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

¶35

WRIT PETITION NO: 1795 OF 2026

¶36

Date: 15.09.2026 BSK

G Varalakshmi v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G Varalakshmi v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases