Dismissed¶37

V. Suguna Kumari v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC9 Jul 2026WP/17878/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

APHC010334652026; W.P.No.17878 of 2026; High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati; Maheswara Rao Kuncheam, J.; decided 10.07.2026; police interference in civil dispute; Chilamathur Police Station; Sri Satya Sai District (erstwhile Anantapur); OS.No.51 of 2025 Senior Civil Judge Hindupur; Article 226 Constitution of India; Section 151 CPC; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; no order as to costs; interlocutory applications closed.

What did the court decide?

None on merits; leave to withdraw the writ petition granted, no order as to costs, and pending interlocutory applications closed. ¶37

V. Suguna Kumari Vs The State of Andhra… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

[3504]

¶2

Date of pronouncement : 10.07.2026 Date of uploading : 18.07.2026

¶3

APHC010334652026

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

FRIDAY, THE 10^th DAY OF JULY 2026

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO: 17878/2026

¶9

Between:

¶10

V. SUGUNA KUMARI, D/O. LATE V. NANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, OCC SINECURE, R/O.ANNAPOORNA ESTATE, YEGNISETTIPALLI VILLAGE, DEMAKETHEPALLI POST, CHILAMATHUR MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT ERSTWHILE ANANTAPUR DISTRICT - 515341.

¶11

V. JAYALAKSHMI, W/O. P.V.RADHAKRISHNA, D/O. LATE V. NANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, OCC SINECURE, RIO. D.NO.57, 6TH CROSS, CENTRAL EXCISE LAY OUT, SANJAYA NAGAR, RMC 2ND STAGE EXTENTION, BANGALORE - 560094.

¶12

P. ANNAPOORNA, W/O.P.V.MANJUNATH, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, RIO. ANNAPOORNA ESTATE, YEGNISETTIPALLI VILLAGE, DEMAKETHEPALLI POST, CHILAMATHUR MANDAL,SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT ERSTWHILE ANANTAPUR DISTRICT - 515341

¶13

...PETITIONER(S)

¶14

AND

¶15

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522239.

¶16

THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT, AT PUTTAPARTHI, ERSTWHILE ANANTAPUR DISTRICT -515134.

¶17

¶18

MRK,J W.P.No.17878 of 2026

¶19

THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, HINDUPUR, HINDUPUR TOWN, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT ERSTWHILE ANANTAPUR DISTRICT - 515201.

¶20

THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, HINDUPUR RURAL POLICE STATION, HINDUPUR TOWN, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE ANANTAPUR DISTRICT - 515201.

¶21

THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHILAMATHUR POLICE STATION, CHILAMATHUR MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE ANANTAPUR DISTRICT - 515341.

¶22

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶23

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus questioning the action of the 5th respondent interfering in civil disputes in respect of land an extent of Ac.47.91 cents in Sy.No.33, an extent of Ac.6.47 cents in Sy.No.41-1, an extent of Ac.9.00 cents in Sy.No.922A and an extent of Ac.9.00 cents in Sy.No.91-6A situated at Yegnisettipalli Village, Chilamathur Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District Erstwhile Anantapur District which are subject properties of OS.No.51 of 2025 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Hindupur, Sri Satya Sai District without following any procedure known to law and forcing the petitioners to settle the civil matter as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and violative of Article 21, 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in civil disputes in between petitioner and defendants in the suit which is subject matter of OS.No.51 of 2025 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Hindupur, Sri Satya Sai District and pas

¶24

IA NO: 1 OF 2026

¶25

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent police not to harass the petitioners requiring them to attend the police station without there being any crime by interfering in civil matter which is subject matter of OS.No.51 of 2025 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Hindupur, Sri Satya Sai District, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass

¶26

¶27

MRK,J W.P.No.17878 of 2026

¶28

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶29

1.P NARAHARI BABU

¶30

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶31

1.GP FOR HOME

¶32

¶33

MRK,J W.P.No.17878 of 2026

¶34

The Court made the following Order:

¶35

Mr. G.Sai Kumar, learned counsel representing Mr. P.Narahari Babu, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition.

¶36

Permission is accorded.

¶37

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶38

As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶39

______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J

¶40

Dated: 10.07.2026 MDP

V. Suguna Kumari v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V. Suguna Kumari v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tere Nehemia Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Maddela Bhaskara Rao Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Neeli Syed Zahida Begum Alias Shaik Zahida Begum Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Swathi Kumar Vulli Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Inthiyaz alias Yellala Shaik Imtiaz Ahammed Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Muddapu Appala Naidu Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh