The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. The court granted permission and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn with no costs. All pending miscellaneous applications were closed.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; no costs; pending miscellaneous applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
APHC010350242025
[3543]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 16th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
WRIT PETITION No: 17753 of 2025
Between:
AND
...RESPONDENT(S):
2
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Smt.AVANIJA INUGANTI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
3
The Court made the following order : (Per NJS, J)
As seen from the relief sought for, it would appear that the writ petition is not maintainable. However, it is stated by Mr.D.Siddi Srikar, learned counsel representing Smt.Avanija Inuganti that the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.
Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as
withdrawn. No costs.
As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall
stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
_____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
Date: 16.09.2026 BLV
4
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
W.P.No.17753 of 2025
Dt: 16.09.2026
BLV
Jagatha Venk A Ta Gangadhar
The State of Andhra Pradesh
The Chief Commissioner ST, Commercial Department
The Assistance Commissioner ST, Kakinada Circle
Sidhvi Infrastructure Projects Limited
Ninala Jayasurya
T.C.D. Sekhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
