This Section 194 order dismisses a writ petition challenging dispossession from agricultural lands due to nonprosecution. The court noted the petitioners had no representation despite listing for dismissal.
Writ petition dismissed for nonprosecution; no order as to costs; pending interlocutory applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APHC010345242023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3330]
FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.17605 of 2023
Between:
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
2
YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, MADDIKERA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. RR 6 TO 8 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER THE COURT'S ORDER DT.04.11.2025 IN I.A.NO.01 OF 2024.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in trying to dispossess the petitioners from their agricultural lands admeasuring Ac.0.36 cents in Sy.No.135/1B, Ac.0.77 in Sy.No.135/2B, Ac.0.69 cents in Sy.No.135/3B, Ac.0.64 cents in Sy.No.135/4B, Ac.0.54 cents in Sy.No.135/5B, and Ac.0.21 cents in Sy.No.135/9B (totaling Ac.3.21 cents). Ac.0.33 cents in Sy.No.134/1B, Ac.0.90 cents in Sy.No.134/2B, Ac.0.76 cents in Sy.No.134/3B, Ac.0.61 cents in Sy.No.134/4B and Ac.0.43 cents in Sy.No.134/513. Ac.3.22 cents in Sy.No.137/2A and Ac.3.16 cents in Sy.No.136/2A situated at Maddikera (West) Village of Maddikera Mandal, Kurnool District with the aid of Police i.e. 5th respondent, without following due process of law, without issuing any notice under provisions of A.P. Encroachment Act or under Land Acquisition Act as bad, illegal, arbitrary, unjust, improper, contrary to rules, contrary to law and in violation of principles of natural justice guaranteed under Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the above said lands.
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
The Court made the following:
3
ORDER:
Though the matter is listed under the caption “For Dismissal”, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It evinces that the petitioners have no interest in prosecuting the case.
Therefore, the present Writ Petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
Date: 02.01.2026
Siva/CMK
4
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.17605 of 2023
Date: 02.01.2026
Siva/CMK
YARRAGUDI KOLLAMMA
NALLAMALA HANUMAKKA
YARRAGUDI NAGAMMA
YERRAGUDI AMPAMMA
THE STATE OF AP
TAPPETA MALLAKKA
TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
