Allowed

Vadde Naresh v. a P Education and Welfare Infrastructure Development Corporation (Apewidc)

Andhra Pradesh HC9 Sept 2026WP/17116/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition sought intervention for non-payment of a contract sum. The Single Judge affirmed the entitlement to the principal amount and directed payment, establishing a framework for resolving future interest disputes via representation and hearing if not admitted.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to pay Rs.67,50,376/- within four months. Petitioner at liberty to claim interest via representation subject to hearing.

Vadde Naresh Vs a P Education and… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

APHC010305202026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY, THE 10^th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 17116 OF 2026

¶7

Between:

¶8

Vadde Naresh, S/o V Lakshmiaiah, aged 35 years, R/o H.No.1-76,Main Road, Marella (V), Tuggali (M), Kurnool District

¶9

...Petitioner

¶10

AND

¶11

A P Education and Welfare Infrastructure Development Corporation APEWIDC, Rep by its Managing Director, D.No.975, Sai Fortune Heights Block-A, Vaddeswaram Village, Guntur District- 522302

¶12

The Chief Engineer, AP Education and Welfare Infrastructure Development Corporation (APEWIDC), Vijayawada, NTR District-520001

¶13

District Social Welfare Officer, Kurnool, Kurnool District- 518001

¶14

District CollectorAPEWIDC, Kurnool, Kurnool District- 518001

¶15

The Superintendent Engineer FAC, AP Education and Welfare Infrastructure Development Corporation (APEWIDC), Kadapa, Y S R Kadapa District-516001

¶16

The Executive Engineer, AP Education and Welfare Infrastructure Development Corporation (APEWIDC), Kurnool, Kurnool District- 518001

¶17

The Director of Works and Accounts, Vijayawada, Krishna District- 520001

¶18

¶19

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District-522237

¶20

...Respondents

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner: KOMMA VIJAYA RAJ KUMAR

¶22

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE

¶23

Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING

¶24

¶25

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 17116 OF 2026

¶26

The Court made the following order:

¶27

The petitioner had been awarded the contract of work(s) under the subject scheme in Kurnool District. After execution of the said contract, a final bill was prepared for a sum of Rs.67,50,376/- as per the sanctioned orders. As the payment of the said amount has not been made by the respondents, the petitioner has approached this Court by way of this writ petition.

¶28

It is the contention of the petitioner that even though the respondents admitted that the petitioner is entitled for payment of Rs.67,50,376/-, no payment is being made. The petitioner contends that such non-payment of money is clearly arbitrary and high-handed requiring the interference of this Court.

¶29

This Court, in various orders, including the judgment of a learned Single Judge of this Court dated 05.10.2021 in W.P.No.10038 of 2021 and batch had taken the view that such non-payment of dues is arbitrary and that such dues need to be cleared by the respondents at the earliest.

¶30

On the other hand, learned Standing Counsel for the APEWIDC, Krishna has placed on record the written instructions received from the Executive Engineer, APEWIDC, Vijayawada admitting gross amount of Rs.67,50,376/- payable to the petitioner. The written instructions further indicate that the bill was already uploaded and waiting for fund clearance.

¶31

¶32

In view of the aforesaid directions of this Court in various cases and

¶33

after hearing the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for Corporation, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of this Writ Petition.

¶34

In fact there is no admission by the Respondents either in their Written Instructions regarding the payment of interest component or by oral submissions made by the Government Pleader/Standing Counsel for Respondents. Much less, the interest component as claimed by the petitioner was neither admitted nor approved at their final bills of the respondents. Hence, in the absence of any such admission, this Court is not inclined to grant any specific amount as it admitted under the head of interest. However, the Petitioner is entitled for interest component as per the terms of Agreement if permits and also in the case of delayed payments, as per the ratio laid down by the Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.724 of 2021.

¶35

Therefore, the respondents are hereby directed to pay admitted gross amount Rs.67,50,376/- within a period of four (04) months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. As far as interest is concerned, if both parties have agreed regarding the quantum of amount towards interest, the same should be paid along with admitted amount, if not, petitioner is at liberty to submit a representation or a Memo of Statement requesting for payment of interest. If petitioner is entitled for the same, after such submission of representation or Memo, the concerned respondent authorities shall consider and pass appropriate orders after providing opportunity of hearing to both

¶36

¶37

parties in case of rejection or reduction of interest amount claimed by the

¶38

petitioner, within a period of four (04) months thereafter.

¶39

With these observations and directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of.

¶40

No order as to costs.

¶41

Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.

¶42

________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J

Dt: 10.09.2026 Mnr

166

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA

¶47

WRIT PETITION No.17116 OF 2026

¶48

Dt: 10.09.2026

¶49

Mnr

Vadde Naresh v. a P Education and Welfare Infrastructure Development Corporation (Apewidc)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vadde Naresh v. a P Education and Welfare Infrastructure Development Corporation (Apewidc)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases