Court dismissed a writ petition seeking continuation of service and direction against termination as infructuous. The petitioners' counsel stated the cause no longer required adjudication, warranting dismissal with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APHC010422702006
[3459]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 16787/2006
Between:
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly a writ in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in directing not to attend the duties as 3 months notice period was over even during the pendency of the representation/appeal before the respondents 1 and 2 as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of Articles 14,16 and 21 of the constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.3 to continue the petitioners in service and pass
2
IA NO: 1 OF 2006(WPMP 21032 OF 2006
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.3 to continue the petitioners in service as Head master and Hindi Pandit pending the disposal of the above writ petition and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
3
The Court made the following ORDER:
Sri S.Girimoji Rao, learned counsel for the writ petitioners, submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the matter has become infructuous.
In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
Date: 11.09.2026
PSK
4
24
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION No: 16787/2006
Date: 11.09.2026
W PSK
1 provisions across 1 enactments
G.KRISHNA MURTHY
G.RAMA KRISHNA SASTRT
THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, KAKINADA
THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER EAST GODAVARI
THE SECRETARY AND CORRESPONDENT GANDHI CENTENARY, SCHOOL, KAKINADA
JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
