Shaik Haseena v. the State of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition closed as infructuous/moot — cause did not survive because Respondent No.2 (Municipal Corporation of Guntur) had already demolished the subject premises (D.No.84-79, G.T.Road Area, Guntur); challenge was to Final Notice No.01/1021/GMC/UC/2025-WPRS68 dated 18.06.2026 under the A.P. Municipal Corporations Act, 1955 directing demolition within 24 hours; invoked Article 226 and Articles 14, 19, 21, 300-A; IA No.1/2026 under Section 151 CPC sought stay of further proceedings; no order as to costs; single judge (Justice Harinath.N), decided 14.07.2026; no merits adjudicated, no cases cited, no relief granted.
What did the court decide?
No substantive relief; the Writ Petition was closed without adjudication as the cause did not survive (Respondent No.2 had already demolished the subject property), with no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, also stand closed.