Petitioner sought writ relief against electricity connections granted to a third party without following procedure. The Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition, which was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition was accorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3329]
APHC010464472016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 15579/2016
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
2
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, Order or direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 1, 2 and 4 in granting 3 electricity service connections to the 5th respondent for the land belongs to the Petitioner covered by Plot No. 22 in survey No. 367/2 of Sangam Village and Mandal, Sri Potti Sriramulu Nellore District without following the procedure and contrary to Regulations and ekren though 5th respondent has no right or title on the said Plot is arbitfary, unreasonable and accordingly direct the respondents 1, 2 and 4 to consider the representation of the Petitionier through her legal notice dated 19-3-2016 by disconnecting the power supply of the electricity connections bearing service Nos. 2931, 368o and 3370 granted in the name of the 5th respondent
IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 19284 OF 2016
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No. 2 to consider the representation of the Petitioner throtiih her legal notice dated 19-3-2016 by taking necessary action as per law by disconnecting the electricity supply of the service connections Nos. 2931, 3680 and 3370 issued in the name of the 5th respondent, pending the disposal of the Writ Petition
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.K MURALIDHAR REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO.15579 OF 2016
ORDER:
______________________________________ JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA Date: 11-09-2026
BSM
4
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO.15579 OF 2016
Date 11-09-2026
W
BSM
Smt. Ippagunta Koteswari
The Superintendent Engineer, Andhra Pradesh Southern Power Distribution Corporation Ltd.
Smt Kaku Bujjamma
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
