Mylapalli Koteswara Rao, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition under Article 226 closed without merits adjudication; mandamus sought against Tahsildar and SHO, Anakapalli (respondents 5 and 6) for threatening petitioners to vacate Ac.1.40 cents in Sy.No.798/12, Anakapalli District at instance of private respondent Malla Venkata Appa Rao; allegations of violation of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A; GP for Home submitted on written instructions that police advised the 5th petitioner to approach the civil Court, dispute being civil in nature, and stand by it for all parties; interim application under Section 151 CPC; petition disposed/closed as no further orders necessary; instructions part of record; no costs; miscellaneous petitions closed; decided 11.06.2026 by Justice A. Hari Haranadha Sarma, Andhra Pradesh High Court, Amaravati; no case law cited.
What did the court decide?
No substantive relief; the writ petition was closed as no further orders were necessary upon recording the State's representation that the dispute is civil in nature and the police advised the petitioners to approach the civil Court; instructions form part of the record; no order as to costs.