Dismissed¶35

Miriyala Prasada Rao S/o. Sarangapani, v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Revenue (Endowments)

Andhra Pradesh HC2 Mar 2026WP/12600/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Andhra Pradesh High Court at Amaravati; WP 12600/2014; Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda J; order dated 03.03.2026; dismissed as infructuous; Guntur Annadana Samajam; Endowments Department; Executive Officer bar on entry to Samajam premises; Rc.No.Nil/2014 dated 19-4-2014; writ of mandamus; Articles 14, 19, 21; natural justice; Endowments Act; Section 151 CPC interim suspension (WPMP 15805 of 2014); petitioners Miriyala Prasada Rao and Miriyala Gopi Kumar; no relief granted; no cases cited.

What did the court decide?

On the joint submission of both learned counsel that the cause in the writ petition did not survive for further adjudication and had become infructuous, the court recorded the submission and dismissed the writ petition as infructuous, with no order as to costs. ¶35

Miriyala Prasada Rao S/o. Sarangapani, Vs… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

APHC010824992014

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

[3329]

¶4

TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 12600/2014

¶7

Between:

¶8

MIRIYALA PRASADA RAO S/O. SARANGAPANI,, OCC:- PRESIDENT OF GUNTUR CITY CITIZENS WELFARE ASSOCIATION, REGD.NO. 769/2004, DOOR NO. 4-13-69, AMARVATHI ROAD, GUNTUR -7 AND EX-CHAIRMAN OF THE GUNTUR ANNADANA SAMAJAM, AMARAVATHI ROAD, GUNTUR.

¶9

MIRIYALA GOPI KUMAR,, S/O.MIRIYALA PRASADA RAO, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC: EX-CHAIRMAN, THE GUNTUR ANNADANA SAMAJAM, R/O.DOOR NO.4-8-312, SAKETHAPURAM, KORITAPADU, GUNTUR.

¶10

...PETITIONER(S)

¶11

AND

¶12

THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH REVENUE ENDOWMENTS, DEPARTMENT REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD.

¶13

THE COMMISSIONER ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT A P BOGGULAKUNTA, HYD.

¶14

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, GUNTUR- 522001.

¶15

THE ASSISTANT COMMISIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, GUNTUR- 522001.

¶16

THE GUNTUR ANNADANA SAMAJAM DOOR NO 41369, REP. BY ITS

¶17

¶18

EXECUTIVE OFFICER, AMARAVATHI ROAD, GUNTUR- 522007.

¶19

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶20

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the proceedings of 5th respondent in Rc.No.Nil/2014, dated 19-4-2014, where under the Executive Officer has directed the petitioners not to enter into the premises of The Guntur Annadana Samajam situated at Door No.4-13-69, where The Guntur City Citizens Welfare Association, had its office in the said premises, for which the 1st petitioner is the President, as bad, illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, without notice, without jurisdiction, contrary to the provisions of the Endowments Act and in gross violation of principles of natural justice and offends Articles 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequentially set aside the same

¶21

IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 15805 OF 2014

¶22

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of proceedings of 5th respondent in Rc.No.Nil/2014, dated 19-4-2014, where under the Executive Officer has directed the petitioners not to enter into the premises of The Guntur Annadana Samajam situated at Door No.4- 13-69, where The Guntur City Citizens Welfare Association, had its office in the said premises, for which the petitioner is the President, pending disposal of present Writ Petition

¶23

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶24

1.V V N NARASIMHAM

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶26

1.V T M PRASAD

¶27

2.GP FOR ENDOWMENTS

¶28

The Court made the following:

¶29

¶30

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA

¶31

WRIT PETITION NO: 12600/2014

¶32

ORDER:

¶33

Heard Sri B.Naga Raju, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Kappeara Koteswara Rao, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.5.

¶34

When the matter is taken up for hearing, both the learned counsel submits that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication and the matter becomes infructuous.

¶35