Christy Friedgram Industry Private Limited v. the State of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
Proceeding sheet, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati, NV, J, dated 13.07.2026, in six writ petitions (W.P.Nos.36674, 36675, 36748, 36753 of 2025; W.P.Nos.59 and 1208 of 2026) apparently concerning a tender process. Disposition: writ petitions dismissed by common order pronounced in open Court, reasons in a separate order not included in the sheet. Post-order consent direction: respondents free to finalize the tender but barred from entering into any agreement for one week. Counsel noted: S.S. Prasad (Senior Counsel) and B. Abhay Siddhanth Mootha; D. Yathindra Dev for the learned Advocate General. No statutes or precedents are cited anywhere in the sheet.
What did the court decide?
No merits relief to the petitioners (writ petitions dismissed vide separate order); by consent, the respondents were permitted to finalize the tender but directed not to enter into any agreement for a period of one week.