Chiranjeevi Reddy Institute of Engineering and Technology, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH.

¶16

JAWAHARLAL NEHRU TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY, ANANTAPUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR

¶17

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶18

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent

¶19

2

¶20

No. 2 in not taking steps to conduct the Viva Voce examinations for the final year MBA and B.Tech students of the Petitioner Institution, by insisting upon payment of the University Common Services Fee (UCS Fee), as being without jurisdiction, arbitrary, illegal, unreasonable and violative of the Petitioners fundamental right to establish and administer an educational institution and set aside the same and consequently direct the Respondents to forthwith conduct the Viva Voce examinations for the final year MBA and B.Tech students of the Petitioner Institution without insisting upon payment of the UCS Fee

¶21

IA NO: 1 OF 2026

¶22

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents, more particularly Respondent No. 2, to forthwith conduct the Viva Voce examinations for the final year MBA and B.Tech students of the Petitioner Institution without insisting upon payment of the University Common Services Fee (UCS Fee) pending disposal of the present Writ 9 Petition

¶23

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶24

1.P BADRINATH

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶26

1.GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION

¶27

2.D KRISHNA SC FOR JNTU ANANTHAPURAMU

¶28

3

¶29

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

¶30

WRIT PETITION NO: 10924/2026

¶31

The Court made the following Order:

¶32

It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that the cause does not survive and no further orders are required to be passed in the present writ petition.

¶33